From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Message-ID: <1517956309.2312.172.camel@kernel.crashing.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] of_pci_irq: add a check to fallback to standard device tree parsing From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Ryder Lee Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 09:31:49 +1100 In-Reply-To: <1517895732.23319.21.camel@mtkswgap22> References: <31c765c53e85e41bfc001d110d69e46c9967f4e7.1516961656.git.ryder.lee@mediatek.com> <1517563970.24622.9.camel@mtkswgap22> <1517866584.2312.140.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <1517884738.16010.27.camel@mtkswgap22> <1517889903.2312.151.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <1517891471.20869.6.camel@mtkswgap22> <1517892624.2312.167.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <1517895732.23319.21.camel@mtkswgap22> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Arnd Bergmann , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Frank Rowand , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+bjorn=helgaas.com@lists.infradead.org List-ID: On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 13:42 +0800, Ryder Lee wrote: > Thanks for explanation. > > So I guess the better way to achieve my aim - one IRQ per slot that is > connected to all INTx and get propagated through the bridges (and for > those root ports own interrupts (PME ..)} is to add interrupt-map > properties in both parent and root port nodes. > > Something like this: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9970923// ,right? Yup. Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel