From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc: Use generic pci_mmap_resource_range()
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 15:24:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519053858.7876.84.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180219.094951.2098243214524004486.davem@davemloft.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1749 bytes --]
On Mon, 2018-02-19 at 09:49 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 13:04:12 +0000
>
> >
> > Commit f719582435 ("PCI: Add pci_mmap_resource_range() and use it for
> > ARM64") added this generic function with the intent of using it
> > everywhere and ultimately killing the old arch-specific implementations.
> >
> > Let's get on with that eradication...
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
>
> David, the generic code is definitely doing different things.
Note that this is new "generic" code that I added last year, specifically to be able to obsolete all the old arch-specific code.
The main reason for the change was to take host physical addresses, instead of converting to via legacy "pci_resource_to_user()" even for the new sysfs API.
The details are hazy right now — I deliberately held back the "fun" architectures and sent only the no-brainers in the first batch via Bjorn's PCI tree, and then promptly forgot about it for a year.
But I definitely *attempted* to ensure that the new code would cover all the requirements of SPARC and the various architectures that have lifted and modified the SPARC PCI code over the years.
> For one, the sparc specific code allows mmap'ing any address range
> within a PCI bus device. The generic code does not allow that.
You mean any address range in a given PCI bus even if there is no
actual device with a BAR at the corresponding address?
Would I be right to assume this was only available through the legacy
procfs API? I think it should be possible to accommodate it, and it
does look like I'd missed this requirement the first time round; thanks
for pointing it out.
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5213 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-19 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-19 13:04 [PATCH] sparc: Use generic pci_mmap_resource_range() David Woodhouse
2018-02-19 14:49 ` David Miller
2018-02-19 15:24 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2018-02-19 15:30 ` David Miller
2018-02-28 23:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-03-01 3:28 ` David Miller
2018-03-01 6:53 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1519053858.7876.84.camel@infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).