linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oza Pawandeep <poza@codeaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, Wei Zhang <wzhang@fb.com>,
	Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
	Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Oza Pawandeep <poza@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v10 6/7] PCI: Unify wait for link active into generic pci
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 21:32:11 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519315332-26852-7-git-send-email-poza@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519315332-26852-1-git-send-email-poza@codeaurora.org>

Clients such as pciehp, dpc are using pcie_wait_link_active, which waits
till the link becomes active or inactive.

Made generic function and moved it to drivers/pci/pci.c

Signed-off-by: Oza Pawandeep <poza@codeaurora.org>

diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
index 18a42f8..de9b0ea 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
@@ -231,25 +231,11 @@ bool pciehp_check_link_active(struct controller *ctrl)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void __pcie_wait_link_active(struct controller *ctrl, bool active)
+static bool pcie_wait_link_active(struct controller *ctrl)
 {
-	int timeout = 1000;
-
-	if (pciehp_check_link_active(ctrl) == active)
-		return;
-	while (timeout > 0) {
-		msleep(10);
-		timeout -= 10;
-		if (pciehp_check_link_active(ctrl) == active)
-			return;
-	}
-	ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "Data Link Layer Link Active not %s in 1000 msec\n",
-			active ? "set" : "cleared");
-}
+	struct pci_dev *pdev = ctrl_dev(ctrl);
 
-static void pcie_wait_link_active(struct controller *ctrl)
-{
-	__pcie_wait_link_active(ctrl, true);
+	return pci_wait_for_link(pdev, true);
 }
 
 static bool pci_bus_check_dev(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
index f6a4dd1..5440696 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
@@ -4176,6 +4176,40 @@ static int pci_pm_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/**
+ * pci__wait_for_link - Wait for link till its active/inactive
+ * @pdev: Bridge device
+ * @active: waiting for active or inactive ?
+ *
+ * Use this to wait till link becomes active or inactive.
+ */
+bool pci_wait_for_link(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool active)
+{
+	int timeout = 1000;
+	bool ret;
+	u16 lnk_status;
+
+	pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &lnk_status);
+	ret = !!(lnk_status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA);
+
+	while ((ret != active) && (timeout > 0)) {
+		msleep(10);
+		timeout -= 10;
+		pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &lnk_status);
+		ret = !!(lnk_status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA);
+	}
+
+	if (ret == active)
+		return true;
+
+	dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &pdev->dev,
+		   "Data Link Layer Link Active not %s in 1000 msec\n",
+		   active ? "set" : "cleared");
+
+	return false;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_wait_for_link);
+
 void pci_reset_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
 	u16 ctrl;
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c
index 208b427..0524bd3 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/pcie-dpc.c
@@ -122,19 +122,9 @@ static int dpc_wait_rp_inactive(struct dpc_dev *dpc)
 
 static void dpc_wait_link_inactive(struct dpc_dev *dpc)
 {
-	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ;
 	struct pci_dev *pdev = dpc->dev->port;
-	struct device *dev = &dpc->dev->device;
-	u16 lnk_status;
 
-	pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &lnk_status);
-	while (lnk_status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA &&
-					!time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
-		msleep(10);
-		pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &lnk_status);
-	}
-	if (lnk_status & PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_DLLLA)
-		dev_warn(dev, "Link state not disabled for DPC event\n");
+	pci_wait_for_link(pdev, false);
 }
 
 /**
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index 024a1be..cb674c3 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -1195,6 +1195,7 @@ int pci_add_ext_cap_save_buffer(struct pci_dev *dev,
 int pci_request_selected_regions(struct pci_dev *, int, const char *);
 int pci_request_selected_regions_exclusive(struct pci_dev *, int, const char *);
 void pci_release_selected_regions(struct pci_dev *, int);
+bool pci_wait_for_link(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool active);
 
 /* drivers/pci/bus.c */
 struct pci_bus *pci_bus_get(struct pci_bus *bus);
-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.,
a Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-02-22 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-22 16:02 [PATCH v10 0/7] Address error and recovery for AER and DPC Oza Pawandeep
2018-02-22 16:02 ` [PATCH v10 1/7] PCI/AER: Rename error recovery to generic pci naming Oza Pawandeep
2018-02-22 18:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-02-23  5:24     ` poza
2018-02-22 16:02 ` [PATCH v10 2/7] PCI/AER: factor out error reporting from AER Oza Pawandeep
2018-02-22 18:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-02-22 18:42     ` David Laight
2018-02-22 16:02 ` [PATCH v10 3/7] PCI/ERR: add mutex to synchronize recovery Oza Pawandeep
2018-02-22 18:36   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-02-23  5:27     ` poza
2018-02-22 16:02 ` [PATCH v10 4/7] PCI/DPC: Unify and plumb error handling into DPC Oza Pawandeep
2018-02-22 18:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-02-23  5:28     ` poza
2018-02-22 16:02 ` [PATCH v10 5/7] PCI/AER: Unify aer error defines at single space Oza Pawandeep
2018-02-22 16:06   ` poza
2018-02-22 16:02 ` Oza Pawandeep [this message]
2018-02-22 18:43   ` [PATCH v10 6/7] PCI: Unify wait for link active into generic pci Christoph Hellwig
2018-02-23  6:53     ` poza
2018-02-22 16:02 ` [PATCH v10 7/7] PCI/DPC: Enumerate the devices after DPC trigger event Oza Pawandeep

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1519315332-26852-7-git-send-email-poza@codeaurora.org \
    --to=poza@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liudongdong3@huawei.com \
    --cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=wzhang@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).