linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>,
	Richard Leitner <dev@g0hl1n.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, mathias.nyman@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: host: pci: introduce PCI vendor ID for Netlogic
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:27:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521041253.4511.16.camel@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a97cd8ba-3934-dc88-8851-465f0313162b@skidata.com>

Am Mittwoch, den 14.03.2018, 14:31 +0100 schrieb Richard Leitner:
> Hi Oliver,
> thank you for your feedback!
> 
> On 03/14/2018 01:17 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 14.03.2018, 11:29 +0100 schrieb Richard Leitner:
> > > From: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
> > > 
> > > Replace the hardcoded PCI vendor ID of Netlogic with a definition in
> > > pci_ids.h
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > in general, why?
> > Does this patch generate any benefit for any developer
> > reading the source? I don't see it. Does it cause an
> > issue for anybody who has a log file with the nummerical
> > ID and needs to grep for it? Yes it does.
> 
> I'll send a v2 where I also use this definition in 
> arch/mips/netlogic/xlp/ instead of PCI_VENDOR_NETLOGIC from
> arch/mips/include/asm/netlogic/xlp-hal/iomap.h.
> 
> Therefore it will remove this definition from the iomap.h
> and move it to pci_ids.h
> 
> This will IMHO be a clear benefit as it removes a redundant
> definition.

Well, but it does not. Removing a redundant definition is a clear
benefit. But you are not removing a definition. You are introducing
a preprocessor constant. Why?
What is its benefit?

	Regards
		Oliver

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-14 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-14 10:29 [PATCH 0/3] usb: host: pci: PCI ID consolidation Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] usb: host: pci: use existing Intel PCI ID macros Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 10:48   ` Greg KH
2018-03-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] usb: host: pci: introduce PCI vendor ID for Netlogic Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 10:48   ` Greg KH
2018-03-14 11:36     ` Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 11:49       ` Greg KH
2018-03-14 12:17   ` Oliver Neukum
2018-03-14 13:31     ` Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 15:27       ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2018-03-14 15:44         ` Richard Leitner
2018-03-15  9:26           ` Oliver Neukum
2018-03-15  9:47             ` Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] usb: host: pci: replace hardcoded renesas PCI IDs Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 10:49   ` Greg KH
2018-03-14 11:38     ` Richard Leitner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1521041253.4511.16.camel@suse.com \
    --to=oneukum@suse.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dev@g0hl1n.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=richard.leitner@skidata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).