From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>,
Richard Leitner <dev@g0hl1n.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, mathias.nyman@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] usb: host: pci: introduce PCI vendor ID for Netlogic
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:27:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521041253.4511.16.camel@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a97cd8ba-3934-dc88-8851-465f0313162b@skidata.com>
Am Mittwoch, den 14.03.2018, 14:31 +0100 schrieb Richard Leitner:
> Hi Oliver,
> thank you for your feedback!
>
> On 03/14/2018 01:17 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 14.03.2018, 11:29 +0100 schrieb Richard Leitner:
> > > From: Richard Leitner <richard.leitner@skidata.com>
> > >
> > > Replace the hardcoded PCI vendor ID of Netlogic with a definition in
> > > pci_ids.h
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > in general, why?
> > Does this patch generate any benefit for any developer
> > reading the source? I don't see it. Does it cause an
> > issue for anybody who has a log file with the nummerical
> > ID and needs to grep for it? Yes it does.
>
> I'll send a v2 where I also use this definition in
> arch/mips/netlogic/xlp/ instead of PCI_VENDOR_NETLOGIC from
> arch/mips/include/asm/netlogic/xlp-hal/iomap.h.
>
> Therefore it will remove this definition from the iomap.h
> and move it to pci_ids.h
>
> This will IMHO be a clear benefit as it removes a redundant
> definition.
Well, but it does not. Removing a redundant definition is a clear
benefit. But you are not removing a definition. You are introducing
a preprocessor constant. Why?
What is its benefit?
Regards
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-14 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-14 10:29 [PATCH 0/3] usb: host: pci: PCI ID consolidation Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] usb: host: pci: use existing Intel PCI ID macros Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 10:48 ` Greg KH
2018-03-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] usb: host: pci: introduce PCI vendor ID for Netlogic Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 10:48 ` Greg KH
2018-03-14 11:36 ` Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 11:49 ` Greg KH
2018-03-14 12:17 ` Oliver Neukum
2018-03-14 13:31 ` Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 15:27 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2018-03-14 15:44 ` Richard Leitner
2018-03-15 9:26 ` Oliver Neukum
2018-03-15 9:47 ` Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] usb: host: pci: replace hardcoded renesas PCI IDs Richard Leitner
2018-03-14 10:49 ` Greg KH
2018-03-14 11:38 ` Richard Leitner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1521041253.4511.16.camel@suse.com \
--to=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dev@g0hl1n.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
--cc=richard.leitner@skidata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).