From: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] of_pci_irq: add a check to fallback to standard device tree parsing
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 08:58:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1521161889.13458.1.camel@mtkswgap22> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180315174329.GB22176@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com>
On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 17:43 +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 03:41:49PM +0800, Ryder Lee wrote:
> > A root complex usually consist of a host bridge and multiple P2P bridges,
> > and someone may express that in the form of a root node with many subnodes
> > and list all four interrupts for each slot (child node) in the root node
> > like this:
> >
> > pcie-controller {
> > ...
> > interrupt-map-mask = <0xf800 0 0 7>;
> > interrupt-map = <0x0000 0 0 {INTx} &{interrupt parent} ...>
> > 0x0800 0 0 {INTx} &{interrupt parent} ...>;
> >
> > pcie@0,0 {
> > reg = <0x0000 0 0 0 0>;
> > ...
> > };
> >
> > pcie@1,0 {
> > reg = <0x0800 0 0 0 0>;
> > ...
> > };
> > };
> >
> > As shown above, we'd like to propagate IRQs from a root port to the devices
> > in the hierarchy below it in this way. However, it seems that the current
> > parser couldn't handle such cases and will get something unexpected below:
> >
> > pcieport 0000:00:01.0: assign IRQ: got 213
> > igb 0000:01:00.0: assign IRQ: got 212
> >
> > There is a device which is connected to 2nd slot, but the port doesn't share
> > the same IRQ with its downstream devices. The problem here is that, if the
> > loop found a P2P bridge, it wouldn't check whether the reg property exists
> > in ppnode or not but just pass the subordinate devfn to of_irq_parse_raw(),
> > thus the subsequent flow couldn't correctly resolve them.
> >
> > Fix this by adding a check to fallback to standard device tree parsing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > Please refer to the previous discussion thread: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/829108/
> > ---
> > drivers/of/of_pci_irq.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Hi Ryder,
>
> from the thread discussion I gather I can drop this series from the PCI
> queue and you will update the DT as agreed with Ben, that looks like
> the most reasonable solution to the problem you are facing, please
> let me know if there is anything I am missing.
>
> Thanks,
> Lorenzo
>
Yes, please drop the series.
Thanks
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-16 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-31 7:41 [PATCH 1/2] of_pci_irq: add a check to fallback to standard device tree parsing Ryder Lee
2018-01-31 7:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: PCI: MediaTek: Correct the interrupt-map properties Ryder Lee
2018-02-05 6:08 ` Rob Herring
2018-02-07 12:43 ` Ryder Lee
2018-01-31 16:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] of_pci_irq: add a check to fallback to standard device tree parsing Rob Herring
2018-02-02 9:32 ` Ryder Lee
2018-02-05 21:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-02-06 2:38 ` Ryder Lee
2018-02-06 4:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-02-06 4:31 ` Ryder Lee
2018-02-06 4:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-02-06 5:42 ` Ryder Lee
2018-02-06 22:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2018-02-07 1:58 ` Ryder Lee
2018-03-15 17:43 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-03-16 0:58 ` Ryder Lee [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1521161889.13458.1.camel@mtkswgap22 \
--to=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).