From: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "x86/PCI: VMD: Eliminate index member from IRQ list"
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 05:47:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1571658459-5668-2-git-send-email-jonathan.derrick@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1571658459-5668-1-git-send-email-jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
This reverts commit b31822277abcd7c83d1c1c0af876da9ccdf3b7d6.
In b3182227, index_from_irqs() was added to calculate the irq list index
from the array of irqs, in order to shrink vmd_irq_list for performance.
Due to the embedded srcu_struct within the vmd_irq_list struct having a
varying size depending on a number of factors, the vmd_irq_list struct
no longer guarantees optimal granularity.
This patch removes this unneccesary complexity and is a prep patch for
adding another layer of indirection to the vmd irq lists.
Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
---
drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 16 +++++-----------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
index a35d3f3..c4de95a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
@@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ struct vmd_irq_list {
struct list_head irq_list;
struct srcu_struct srcu;
unsigned int count;
+ unsigned int index;
};
struct vmd_dev {
@@ -108,12 +109,6 @@ static inline struct vmd_dev *vmd_from_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
return container_of(bus->sysdata, struct vmd_dev, sysdata);
}
-static inline unsigned int index_from_irqs(struct vmd_dev *vmd,
- struct vmd_irq_list *irqs)
-{
- return irqs - vmd->irqs;
-}
-
/*
* Drivers managing a device in a VMD domain allocate their own IRQs as before,
* but the MSI entry for the hardware it's driving will be programmed with a
@@ -126,11 +121,10 @@ static void vmd_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
{
struct vmd_irq *vmdirq = data->chip_data;
struct vmd_irq_list *irq = vmdirq->irq;
- struct vmd_dev *vmd = irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(data);
msg->address_hi = MSI_ADDR_BASE_HI;
msg->address_lo = MSI_ADDR_BASE_LO |
- MSI_ADDR_DEST_ID(index_from_irqs(vmd, irq));
+ MSI_ADDR_DEST_ID(irq->index);
msg->data = 0;
}
@@ -230,7 +224,7 @@ static int vmd_msi_init(struct irq_domain *domain, struct msi_domain_info *info,
struct msi_desc *desc = arg->desc;
struct vmd_dev *vmd = vmd_from_bus(msi_desc_to_pci_dev(desc)->bus);
struct vmd_irq *vmdirq = kzalloc(sizeof(*vmdirq), GFP_KERNEL);
- unsigned int index, vector;
+ unsigned int vector;
if (!vmdirq)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -238,8 +232,7 @@ static int vmd_msi_init(struct irq_domain *domain, struct msi_domain_info *info,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vmdirq->node);
vmdirq->irq = vmd_next_irq(vmd, desc);
vmdirq->virq = virq;
- index = index_from_irqs(vmd, vmdirq->irq);
- vector = pci_irq_vector(vmd->dev, index);
+ vector = pci_irq_vector(vmd->dev, vmdirq->irq->index);
irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq, vector, info->chip, vmdirq,
handle_untracked_irq, vmd, NULL);
@@ -776,6 +769,7 @@ static int vmd_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
return err;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vmd->irqs[i].irq_list);
+ vmd->irqs[i].index = i;
err = devm_request_irq(&dev->dev, pci_irq_vector(dev, i),
vmd_irq, IRQF_NO_THREAD,
"vmd", &vmd->irqs[i]);
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-21 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-21 11:47 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: vmd: Fix possible >= MAX_ORDER allocation Jon Derrick
2019-10-21 11:47 ` Jon Derrick [this message]
2019-10-21 11:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: vmd: Add indirection layer to vmd irq lists Jon Derrick
2019-10-31 11:24 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1571658459-5668-2-git-send-email-jonathan.derrick@intel.com \
--to=jonathan.derrick@intel.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).