From: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: vmd: Add indirection layer to vmd irq lists
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 05:47:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1571658459-5668-3-git-send-email-jonathan.derrick@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1571658459-5668-1-git-send-email-jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
With CONFIG_MAXSMP and other debugging options enabled, the size of an
srcu_struct can grow quite large. These are embedded in the vmd_irq_list
struct, and a N=64 allocation can exceed MAX_ORDER, violating reclaim
rules.
This patch changes the irq list array into an array of pointers to irq
lists to avoid allocation failures with greater msix counts.
Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
---
drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
index c4de95a..096006e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct vmd_dev {
char __iomem *cfgbar;
int msix_count;
- struct vmd_irq_list *irqs;
+ struct vmd_irq_list **irqs;
struct pci_sysdata sysdata;
struct resource resources[3];
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static struct vmd_irq_list *vmd_next_irq(struct vmd_dev *vmd, struct msi_desc *d
unsigned long flags;
if (vmd->msix_count == 1)
- return &vmd->irqs[0];
+ return vmd->irqs[0];
/*
* White list for fast-interrupt handlers. All others will share the
@@ -204,17 +204,17 @@ static struct vmd_irq_list *vmd_next_irq(struct vmd_dev *vmd, struct msi_desc *d
case PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_EXPRESS:
break;
default:
- return &vmd->irqs[0];
+ return vmd->irqs[0];
}
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&list_lock, flags);
for (i = 1; i < vmd->msix_count; i++)
- if (vmd->irqs[i].count < vmd->irqs[best].count)
+ if (vmd->irqs[i]->count < vmd->irqs[best]->count)
best = i;
- vmd->irqs[best].count++;
+ vmd->irqs[best]->count++;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&list_lock, flags);
- return &vmd->irqs[best];
+ return vmd->irqs[best];
}
static int vmd_msi_init(struct irq_domain *domain, struct msi_domain_info *info,
@@ -764,15 +764,22 @@ static int vmd_probe(struct pci_dev *dev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
return -ENOMEM;
for (i = 0; i < vmd->msix_count; i++) {
- err = init_srcu_struct(&vmd->irqs[i].srcu);
+ vmd->irqs[i] = devm_kcalloc(&dev->dev, 1, sizeof(**vmd->irqs),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!vmd->irqs[i])
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < vmd->msix_count; i++) {
+ err = init_srcu_struct(&vmd->irqs[i]->srcu);
if (err)
return err;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vmd->irqs[i].irq_list);
- vmd->irqs[i].index = i;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vmd->irqs[i]->irq_list);
+ vmd->irqs[i]->index = i;
err = devm_request_irq(&dev->dev, pci_irq_vector(dev, i),
vmd_irq, IRQF_NO_THREAD,
- "vmd", &vmd->irqs[i]);
+ "vmd", vmd->irqs[i]);
if (err)
return err;
}
@@ -793,7 +800,7 @@ static void vmd_cleanup_srcu(struct vmd_dev *vmd)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < vmd->msix_count; i++)
- cleanup_srcu_struct(&vmd->irqs[i].srcu);
+ cleanup_srcu_struct(&vmd->irqs[i]->srcu);
}
static void vmd_remove(struct pci_dev *dev)
@@ -817,7 +824,7 @@ static int vmd_suspend(struct device *dev)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < vmd->msix_count; i++)
- devm_free_irq(dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, i), &vmd->irqs[i]);
+ devm_free_irq(dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, i), vmd->irqs[i]);
pci_save_state(pdev);
return 0;
@@ -832,7 +839,7 @@ static int vmd_resume(struct device *dev)
for (i = 0; i < vmd->msix_count; i++) {
err = devm_request_irq(dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, i),
vmd_irq, IRQF_NO_THREAD,
- "vmd", &vmd->irqs[i]);
+ "vmd", vmd->irqs[i]);
if (err)
return err;
}
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-21 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-21 11:47 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: vmd: Fix possible >= MAX_ORDER allocation Jon Derrick
2019-10-21 11:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] Revert "x86/PCI: VMD: Eliminate index member from IRQ list" Jon Derrick
2019-10-21 11:47 ` Jon Derrick [this message]
2019-10-31 11:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: vmd: Add indirection layer to vmd irq lists Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1571658459-5668-3-git-send-email-jonathan.derrick@intel.com \
--to=jonathan.derrick@intel.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).