From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Bruce Allan , Jeff Kirsher , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] e1000e: fix pci device enable counter balance Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 02:07:16 +0100 Message-ID: <1582328.fuzuCUZWBa@vostro.rjw.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20130118113019.6698.25941.stgit@zurg> <20130118114218.6698.42484.stgit@zurg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday, January 28, 2013 04:09:38 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > [+cc Rafael] > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:42 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov > wrote: > > __e1000_shutdown() calls pci_disable_device() at the end, thus __e1000_resume() > > should call pci_enable_device_mem() to keep enable counter in balance. > > > > Bug was introduced in commit 23606cf5d1192c2b17912cb2ef6e62f9b11de133 > > ("e1000e / PCI / PM: Add basic runtime PM support (rev. 4)") in v2.6.35 > > > > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov > > Cc: e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > Cc: Jeff Kirsher > > Cc: Bruce Allan > > --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 7 +++++++ > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > > index 2853c11..6bce796 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c > > @@ -5598,6 +5598,13 @@ static int __e1000_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev) > > pci_restore_state(pdev); > > pci_save_state(pdev); > > > > + err = pci_enable_device_mem(pdev); > > + if (err) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, > > + "Cannot re-enable PCI device after suspend.\n"); > > + return err; > > + } > > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas > > Seems right to me, and the other users I looked at (igb, azx, > virtio_pci) call pci_disable_device() in .suspend() and call > pci_enable_device() in .resume() as you propose to do here. > > I assume the e1000 folks will handle this patch (and the previous one). > OK, so this one looks like a genuine fix to me. Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Thanks, Rafael > > + > > e1000e_set_interrupt_capability(adapter); > > if (netif_running(netdev)) { > > err = e1000_request_irq(adapter); > > > > -- -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.