Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Colin King (gmail)" <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PCI: Add TLP Prefix reading to pcie_read_tlp_log()
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 16:27:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <17192051-ddd4-4cc8-a3a1-d8b2ac6a0b71@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de2a07a1-ea99-20d7-69c5-8fdf2f432750@linux.intel.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1421 bytes --]

On 16/01/2025 16:18, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2025, Colin King (gmail) wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> Static analysis shows there is a potential issue in the following commit:
>>
>> commit 00048c2d5f113bb4e82a0a30dfc4ee12590b81f5
>> Author: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
>> Date:   Tue Jan 14 19:08:39 2025 +0200
>>
>>      PCI: Add TLP Prefix reading to pcie_read_tlp_log()
>>
>>
>> The issue is described as follows:
>>
>> unsigned int aer_tlp_log_len(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 aercc)
>> {
>>          return PCIE_STD_NUM_TLP_HEADERLOG +
>>                 (aercc & PCI_ERR_CAP_PREFIX_LOG_PRESENT) ?
>>                 dev->eetlp_prefix_max : 0;
>> }
>>
>>
>> static analysis is warning that the left hand size of the ? operator is always
>> true and so dev->eetlp_prefix_max is always being returned and the 0 is never
>> returned (dead code).
>>
>> I suspect the expected behaviour is as follows:
>>
>>          return PCIE_STD_NUM_TLP_HEADERLOG +
>>                 ((aercc & PCI_ERR_CAP_PREFIX_LOG_PRESENT) ?
>>                 dev->eetlp_prefix_max : 0);
>>
>> ..I'm reluctant to send a fix in case this is not the original intention.
> 
> Your fix looks correct, it should have the parenthesis due to operator
> precedence rules. The intention is to calculate 4 DWs + optionally n E-E
> TLP prefixes.
> 

OK, I'll send a patch later today.

Colin

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 4901 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 840 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2025-01-16 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-16 15:57 PCI: Add TLP Prefix reading to pcie_read_tlp_log() Colin King (gmail)
2025-01-16 16:18 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-01-16 16:27   ` Colin King (gmail) [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=17192051-ddd4-4cc8-a3a1-d8b2ac6a0b71@gmail.com \
    --to=colin.i.king@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox