linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	"Michał Winiarski" <michal.winiarski@intel.com>,
	"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"William McVicker" <willmcvicker@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/25] PCI: Perform reset_resource() and build fail list in sync
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 11:13:51 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19ccc09c-1d6b-930e-6ed6-398b34020ca1@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2d149c6-41a4-4a9a-9739-1ea1c4b06f4b@linaro.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6306 bytes --]

On Mon, 2 Jun 2025, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> On 6/2/25 4:08 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> >>> I think I figured out more about the reason. It's not related to that 
> >>> bridge window resource.
> >>>
> >>> pbus_size_mem() will add also that ROM resource into realloc_head 
> >>> as it is considered (intentionally) optional after the optional change
> >>> (as per "tudor: 2:" line). And that resource is never assigned because 
> 
> cut
> 
> >>> pdev_sort_resources() didn't pick it up into the head list. The next 
> >>> question is why the ROM resource isn't in the head list.
> >>>
> >> It seems the ROM resource is skipped at:
> >> https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-
> >> next.git/tree/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c#n175
> >>
> >> tudor: pdev_sort_resources: ROM [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x0] resource
> >> skipped due to !(r->flags) || r->parent
> > I don't see the device in this print, hope it is for the same device.
> > 
> > In any case, I don't understand what reset resource's flags in between 
> > pbus_size_mem() and pdev_sort_resources(), or alternative, why type 
> > checking in pbus_size_mem() matches if flags == 0 at that point.
> > 
> > Those two functions should work on the same resources, if one skips 
> > something, the other should too. Disparity between them can cause issues, 
> > but despite reading the code multiple times, I couldn't figure out how 
> > that disparity occurs (except for the !pdev_resources_assignable() case).
> 
> cut
> 
> > It is of interest to know why the same resource is treated differently.
> > So what were the resource flags, type* args when it's processed by
> > pbus_size_mem()? If resource's flags are zero at that point but it matches 
> 
> This is the full output: https://termbin.com/mn1x
> for the following prints: https://termbin.com/q57h
> 
> It seems ROM resource is of type 2 at pbus_size_mem() time.
> 
> > one of the types, that would be a bug.
> 
> I'll give another try tomorrow. Thanks,

Those are not the same device, so not the same resource either:

[   16.262745][ T1113] pci 0001:01:00.0: tudor: 2: pbus_size_mem: ROM [mem 0x00000000-0x0000ffff pref] list empty? 0

[   16.267736][ T1113] pcieport 0001:00:00.0: tudor: pdev_sort_resources: ROM [??? 0x00000000 flags 0x0] resource skipped due to !(r->flags) || r->parent

0001:01:00.0
vs
0001:00:00.0

And the resources for 0001:01:00.0 were never processed by 
__pci_bus_assign_resources(). But __pci_bus_assign_resources() should 
recurse to subordinate busses.

And, it seems this boils down to the inconsistency I noticed earlier:

[   16.253464][ T1113] pci 0001:01:00.0: [144d:a5a5] type 00 class 0x000000 PCIe Endpoint

include/linux/pci_ids.h:#define PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED           0x0000

pdev_resources_assignable() checks if class == PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED and 
pdev_sort_resources() bails out without processing those resources.

So please test if this patch solves your problem:


From 00e440f505a79568cf5203dce265488cb3f66941 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 11:07:38 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] PCI: Fix pdev_resources_assignable() disparity
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

pdev_sort_resources() uses pdev_resources_assignable() helper to decide
if device's resources cannot be assigned. pbus_size_mem(), on the other
hand, does not do the same check. This could lead into a situation
where a resource ends up on realloc_head list but is not on the head
list, which is turn prevents emptying the resource from the
realloc_head list in __assign_resources_sorted().

A non-empty realloc_head is unacceptable because it triggers an
internal sanity check as show in this log with a device that has class
0 (PCI_CLASS_NOT_DEFINED):

pci 0001:01:00.0: [144d:a5a5] type 00 class 0x000000 PCIe Endpoint
pci 0001:01:00.0: BAR 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x000fffff 64bit]
pci 0001:01:00.0: ROM [mem 0x00000000-0x0000ffff pref]
pci 0001:01:00.0: enabling Extended Tags
pci 0001:01:00.0: PME# supported from D0 D3hot D3cold
pci 0001:01:00.0: 15.752 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth, limited by 8.0 GT/s PCIe x2 link at 0001:00:00.0 (capable of 31.506 Gb/s with 16.0 GT/s PCIe x2 link)
pcieport 0001:00:00.0: bridge window [mem 0x00100000-0x001fffff] to [bus 01-ff] add_size 100000 add_align 100000
pcieport 0001:00:00.0: bridge window [mem 0x40000000-0x401fffff]: assigned
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at drivers/pci/setup-bus.c:2532!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1]  SMP
...
Call trace:
 pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources+0x110/0x114 (P)
 pci_rescan_bus+0x28/0x48

Use pdev_resources_assignable() also within pbus_size_mem() to skip
processing of non-assignable resources which removes the disparity in
between what resources pdev_sort_resources() and pbus_size_mem()
consider. As non-assignable resources are no longer processed, they are
not added to the realloc_head list, thus the sanity check no longer
triggers.

This disparity problem is very old but only now became apparent after
the commit 2499f5348431 ("PCI: Rework optional resource handling") that
made the ROM resources optional when calculating bridge window sizes
which required adding the resource to the realloc_head list.
Previously, bridge windows were just sized larger than necessary.

Fixes: 2499f5348431 ("PCI: Rework optional resource handling")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
index 54d6f4fa3ce1..da084251df43 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
@@ -1187,6 +1187,7 @@ static int pbus_size_mem(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned long mask,
 			resource_size_t r_size;
 
 			if (r->parent || (r->flags & IORESOURCE_PCI_FIXED) ||
+			    !pdev_resources_assignable(dev) ||
 			    ((r->flags & mask) != type &&
 			     (r->flags & mask) != type2 &&
 			     (r->flags & mask) != type3))

base-commit: 0af2f6be1b4281385b618cb86ad946eded089ac8
-- 
2.39.5


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-03  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-16 17:56 [PATCH 00/25] PCI: Resource fitting/assignment fixes and cleanups Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 01/25] PCI: Remove add_align overwrite unrelated to size0 Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 02/25] PCI: size0 is unrelated to add_align Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 03/25] PCI: Simplify size1 assignment logic Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 04/25] PCI: Optional bridge window size too may need relaxing Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 05/25] PCI: Fix old_size lower bound in calculate_iosize() too Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 06/25] PCI: Use SZ_* instead of literals in setup-bus.c Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 07/25] PCI: resource_set_range/size() conversions Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 08/25] PCI: Add a helper to identify IOV resources Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 09/25] PCI: Check resource_size() separately Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 10/25] PCI: Add pci_resource_num() helper Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 11/25] PCI: Add dev & res local variables to resource assignment funcs Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 12/25] PCI: Converge return paths in __assign_resources_sorted() Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 13/25] PCI: Refactor pdev_sort_resources() & __dev_sort_resources() Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 14/25] PCI: Use while loop and break instead of gotos Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 15/25] PCI: Rename retval to ret Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 16/25] PCI: Consolidate assignment loop next round preparation Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 17/25] PCI: Remove wrong comment from pci_reassign_resource() Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 18/25] PCI: Add restore_dev_resource() Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 19/25] PCI: Extend enable to check for any optional resource Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 20/25] PCI: Always have realloc_head in __assign_resources_sorted() Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 21/25] PCI: Indicate optional resource assignment failures Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 22/25] PCI: Add debug print when releasing resources before retry Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 23/25] PCI: Use res->parent to check is resource is assigned Ilpo Järvinen
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 24/25] PCI: Perform reset_resource() and build fail list in sync Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-01  2:35   ` Guenter Roeck
2025-04-01 10:18     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-01 12:07       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-01 14:15         ` Guenter Roeck
2025-04-01 17:38           ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-11 19:37             ` Ondřej Jirman
2025-04-14  9:52               ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-14 12:19                 ` Ondřej Jirman
2025-04-14 13:15                   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-14 13:43                     ` Ondřej Jirman
2025-04-14 13:52                       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-04-01 13:28       ` Guenter Roeck
2025-05-06 15:03   ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-05-06 15:53     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-05-28 11:22       ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-05-28 11:39         ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-05-28 13:09           ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-05-30  6:55             ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-05-30  6:38         ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-05-30 14:48           ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-02 14:40             ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-06-02 15:08               ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-02 18:42                 ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-06-03  8:13                   ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2025-06-03 10:36                     ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-06-03 10:48                       ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-06-03 11:43                         ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-06-03 14:23                           ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-03 14:43                             ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-03 14:13                       ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-03 15:25                         ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-06-03 17:03                           ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-03 17:09                             ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-02 12:32           ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-06-19  0:30   ` D Scott Phillips
2025-06-24 12:48     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-25 17:45     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-25 20:33       ` D Scott Phillips
2025-06-26  9:22         ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-06-26 14:53           ` D Scott Phillips
2024-12-16 17:56 ` [PATCH 25/25] PCI: Rework optional resource handling Ilpo Järvinen
2025-02-13 21:46 ` [PATCH 00/25] PCI: Resource fitting/assignment fixes and cleanups Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-14  8:18 ` Xiaochun XC17 Li | 李小春 Xavier
2025-02-14 11:53   ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-02-14 21:28     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-14  9:59 ` Xiaochun Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19ccc09c-1d6b-930e-6ed6-398b34020ca1@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.winiarski@intel.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
    --cc=willmcvicker@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).