Linux PCI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kbusch@kernel.org,
	sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, mahesh@linux.ibm.com,
	oohall@gmail.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
	terry.bowman@amd.com, tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] PCI/ERR: Use pcie_aer_is_native() to check for native AER control
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:09:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1eaf1f94-e26b-4313-b6b7-51ad966fe28e@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aPoDbKebJD30NjKG@wunner.de>



在 2025/10/23 18:29, Lukas Wunner 写道:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 10:45:31PM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
>> 	if (host->native_aer || pcie_ports_native) {
>> 		pcie_clear_device_status(bridge);
>> 		pci_aer_clear_nonfatal_status(bridge);
>> 	}
>>
>> This code clears both the PCIe Device Status register and AER status
>> registers when in native AER mode.
>>
>> pcie_clear_device_status() is renamed from
>> pci_aer_clear_device_status(). Does it intends to clear only AER error
>> status?
>>
>> - BIT 0: Correctable Error Detected
>> - BIT 1: Non-Fatal Error Detected
>> - BIT 2: Fatal Error Detected
>> - BIT 3: Unsupported Request Detected
>>
>>  From PCIe spec, BIT 0-2 are logged for functions supporting Advanced
>> Error Handling.
>>
>> I am not sure if we should clear BIT 3, and also BIT 6 (Emergency Power
>> Reduction Detected) and in case a AER error.
> 
> AFAIUI, bits 0 to 3 are what the PCIe r7.0 sec 6.2.1 calls
> "baseline capability" error reporting.  They're supported
> even if AER is not supported.
> 
> Bit 6 has nothing to do with this AFAICS.

Hi, Lukas,

Per PCIe r7.0 section 7.5.3.5:

   **For Functions supporting Advanced Error Handling**, errors are logged
   in this register regardless of the settings of the Uncorrectable Error
   Mask register. Default value of this bit is 0b.

 From this, it's clear that bits 0 to 2 are not logged unless AER is supported.

So, if dev->aer_cap is not true, there’s no need to clear bits 0 to 2.
This validates the dev->aer_cap sanity check in pcie_aer_is_native():

   int pcie_aer_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev)
   {
       struct pci_host_bridge *host = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->bus);

       if (!dev->aer_cap)
           return 0;

       return pcie_ports_native || host->native_aer;
   }
   EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(pcie_aer_is_native, "CXL");

Based on this, the introduction of pcie_aer_is_native() in the patch
seems reasonable and consistent with the PCIe specification.

Further, should we rename pcie_clear_device_status() back to
pci_aer_clear_device_status():

-void pcie_clear_device_status(struct pci_dev *dev)
+void pci_aer_clear_device_status(struct pci_dev *dev)
  {
         u16 sta;

         pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA, &sta);
-       pcie_capability_write_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA, sta);
+       /* Bits 0-2 are logged if AER is supported */
+       pcie_capability_write_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVSTA, sta & 0x7);
  }

I am still uncertain whether bit 3 ("Unsupported Request Detected")
should be cleared in this function. It’s not directly tied to AER
capability.


I’d love to hear your thoughts, as well as @Bjorn’s, on both the renaming
suggestion and whether bit 3 should be cleared alongside bits 0 to 2.

Thanks.
Shuai

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-24  3:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-15  2:41 [PATCH v6 0/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd Shuai Xue
2025-10-15  2:41 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] PCI/DPC: Clarify naming for error port in DPC Handling Shuai Xue
2025-10-15  2:41 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] PCI/DPC: Run recovery on device that detected the error Shuai Xue
2025-10-15  2:41 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] PCI/AER: Report fatal errors of RCiEP and EP if link recoverd Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 10:10   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 12:58     ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 13:54       ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 14:17         ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 14:24           ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 15:20             ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-23 10:48               ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-24  6:43                 ` Shuai Xue
2025-12-16  8:07                   ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 18:38   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2025-10-21  1:51     ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-15  2:41 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] PCI/ERR: Use pcie_aer_is_native() to check for native AER control Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 10:17   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 13:09     ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 13:58       ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 14:45         ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-23 10:29           ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-24  3:09             ` Shuai Xue [this message]
2025-10-24  3:14               ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-24  3:38                 ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-24  4:03                   ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-24  5:37                     ` Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 18:43   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2025-10-15  2:41 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] PCI/AER: Clear both AER fatal and non-fatal status Shuai Xue
2025-10-20 18:44   ` Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
2025-10-21  1:33     ` Shuai Xue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1eaf1f94-e26b-4313-b6b7-51ad966fe28e@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oohall@gmail.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=terry.bowman@amd.com \
    --cc=tianruidong@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox