From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
Cc: "Jon Mason" <jdmason@kudzu.us>,
"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Allen Hubbe" <allenbh@gmail.com>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
ntb@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: align mw naming with config names
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 18:42:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1jwma9lxu1.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aC3/PL3jdGMVHX3n@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810> (Frank Li's message of "Wed, 21 May 2025 12:28:44 -0400")
On Wed 21 May 2025 at 12:28, Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 09:47:14AM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> On Mon 19 May 2025 at 17:21, Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 07:41:48PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> >
>> > PCI tree require keep consistent at subject
>> > git log --oneline drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
>> >
>> > require first char is UP case.
>>
>> Noted
>>
>> >
>> > Align memory window naming with configfs names.
>> >
>> >> The config file related to the memory windows start the numbering of
>> >
>> > memory windows (MW)
>> > then you can use MW later.
>>
>> Sure
>>
>> >
>> >> the MW from 1. The other NTB function does the same, yet the enumeration
>> >> defining the BARs of the vNTB function starts numbering the MW from 0.
>> >>
>> >> Both numbering are fine I suppose but mixing the two is a bit confusing.
>> >> The configfs file being the interface with userspace, lets keep that stable
>> >> and consistently start the numbering of the MW from 1.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
>> >> index 35fa0a21fc91100a5539bff775e7ebc25e1fb9c1..f9f4a8bb65f364962dbf1e9011ab0e4479c61034 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-vntb.c
>> >> @@ -70,9 +70,10 @@ static struct workqueue_struct *kpcintb_workqueue;
>> >> enum epf_ntb_bar {
>> >> BAR_CONFIG,
>> >> BAR_DB,
>> >> - BAR_MW0,
>> >> BAR_MW1,
>> >> BAR_MW2,
>> >> + BAR_MW3,
>> >> + BAR_MW4,
>> >
>> > where use BAR_MW3 and BAR_MW4?
>>
>> This is aligned with the file available in configfs and what is possible
>> in theory with the function, same as the NTB function and NTB host driver.
>>
>> Stopping at MW1 because it is only one used in the driver would be weird
>> and the number later introduced would be wrong.
>
> Yes, but BAR_MW3 and BAR_MW4 should be added only when both was used in code
> actaully.
If you want to be strict about that then BAR_MW4 should go to the next change,
it is needed in the enum.
BAR_MW3 shall stay here because the purpose of this change is to shift the MW
naming by one. MW2 which was present becomes MW3.
>
> Frank
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Frank
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> /*
>> >> @@ -576,7 +577,7 @@ static int epf_ntb_mw_bar_init(struct epf_ntb *ntb)
>> >>
>> >> for (i = 0; i < ntb->num_mws; i++) {
>> >> size = ntb->mws_size[i];
>> >> - barno = ntb->epf_ntb_bar[BAR_MW0 + i];
>> >> + barno = ntb->epf_ntb_bar[BAR_MW1 + i];
>> >>
>> >> ntb->epf->bar[barno].barno = barno;
>> >> ntb->epf->bar[barno].size = size;
>> >> @@ -629,7 +630,7 @@ static void epf_ntb_mw_bar_clear(struct epf_ntb *ntb, int num_mws)
>> >> int i;
>> >>
>> >> for (i = 0; i < num_mws; i++) {
>> >> - barno = ntb->epf_ntb_bar[BAR_MW0 + i];
>> >> + barno = ntb->epf_ntb_bar[BAR_MW1 + i];
>> >> pci_epc_clear_bar(ntb->epf->epc,
>> >> ntb->epf->func_no,
>> >> ntb->epf->vfunc_no,
>> >> @@ -676,7 +677,7 @@ static int epf_ntb_init_epc_bar(struct epf_ntb *ntb)
>> >> epc_features = pci_epc_get_features(ntb->epf->epc, ntb->epf->func_no, ntb->epf->vfunc_no);
>> >>
>> >> /* These are required BARs which are mandatory for NTB functionality */
>> >> - for (bar = BAR_CONFIG; bar <= BAR_MW0; bar++, barno++) {
>> >> + for (bar = BAR_CONFIG; bar <= BAR_MW1; bar++, barno++) {
>> >> barno = pci_epc_get_next_free_bar(epc_features, barno);
>> >> if (barno < 0) {
>> >> dev_err(dev, "Fail to get NTB function BAR\n");
>> >> @@ -1048,7 +1049,7 @@ static int vntb_epf_mw_set_trans(struct ntb_dev *ndev, int pidx, int idx,
>> >> struct device *dev;
>> >>
>> >> dev = &ntb->ntb.dev;
>> >> - barno = ntb->epf_ntb_bar[BAR_MW0 + idx];
>> >> + barno = ntb->epf_ntb_bar[BAR_MW1 + idx];
>> >> epf_bar = &ntb->epf->bar[barno];
>> >> epf_bar->phys_addr = addr;
>> >> epf_bar->barno = barno;
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> 2.47.2
>> >>
>>
>> --
>> Jerome
--
Jerome
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-21 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-05 17:41 [PATCH 0/4] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: allow arbitrary BAR mapping Jerome Brunet
2025-05-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: return an error code on bar init Jerome Brunet
2025-05-19 21:12 ` Frank Li
2025-05-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: align mw naming with config names Jerome Brunet
2025-05-19 21:21 ` Frank Li
2025-05-20 7:47 ` Jerome Brunet
2025-05-21 16:28 ` Frank Li
2025-05-21 16:42 ` Jerome Brunet [this message]
2025-05-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb: allow arbitrary BAR configuration Jerome Brunet
2025-05-19 22:29 ` Frank Li
2025-05-20 8:06 ` Jerome Brunet
2025-05-20 17:08 ` Frank Li
2025-05-05 17:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] NTB: epf: Allow arbitrary BAR mapping Jerome Brunet
2025-05-19 22:44 ` Frank Li
2025-05-20 8:11 ` Jerome Brunet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1jwma9lxu1.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com \
--to=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=Frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=allenbh@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=ntb@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox