From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-RFC 1/2] tile: don't panic on iomap
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:04:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111130070417.GA17781@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo4N8drqe5bHVjzXy_h0HTC8Reye4+8viN4c6TtmwFheXA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 01:04:12PM -0800, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > I think panic on iomap is there just for debugging.
> > If we return NULL instead, the generic pci_iomap will
> > DTRT so we don't need to roll our own.
>
> Just to be explicit about what "doing the right thing" means, here's
> what I think is changing (I think the new behavior is OK, but it *is*
> different):
I think the change is that anyone calling ioport_map *directly*
will fail. pci_iomap callers are mostly unaffected.
>
> Old behavior: Caller calls pci_iomap(), which panics in ioport_map().
Not really, the old pci_iomap simply returned NULL in this case, it
did not call ioport_map.
> New behavior: Caller calls pci_iomap(), ioport_map() returns NULL,
> pci_iomap() returns NULL (failure), caller may check for failure. If
> caller does not check for failure and passes the NULL to
> ioread()/iowrite(), we WARN in bad_io_access().
>
> > static inline void __iomem *ioport_map(unsigned long port, unsigned int len)
> > {
> > - return (void __iomem *) ioport_panic();
> > + pr_info("Trying to map an IO resource - it does not exit on tile.\n");
> > + return NULL;
>
> s/exit/exist/
>
> Since we only expect to see this message during debugging, maybe it
> could be more informative, e.g., use dump_stack() to identify the
> offending driver? I don't think either the "Trying to map" message or
> the "Bad IO access" message is enough to actually make progress in
> debugging.
>
> Bjorn
As explained above, only direct callers of ioport_map get a changed
behaviour. If we start dumping stack there we will hurt users of
pci_iomap which used to get a graceful failure and will start getting
scary messages. Is does not seem to be worth doing to simplify debugging, right?
How about sticking the function name in the pr_info message?
A simple grep for ioport_map will then get you the culprit ...
Like this:
+ pr_info("ioport_map: mapping IO resources is unsupported on tile.\n");
?
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-30 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-29 18:54 [PATCH-RFC 0/2] tile: switch to generic pci_iomap Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-29 18:54 ` [PATCH-RFC 1/2] tile: don't panic on iomap Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-29 21:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2011-11-30 7:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-11-29 22:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-11-30 7:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 9:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-11-30 11:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 14:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-11-30 14:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 15:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-11-30 15:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 18:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-01 17:59 ` [PATCH] lib/devres.c: allow specifying NO_IOPORT while using PCI Chris Metcalf
2011-12-01 18:44 ` Tejun Heo
2011-12-01 18:48 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-12-01 22:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-02 18:48 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-12-05 15:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-12-05 20:08 ` Chris Metcalf
2011-11-30 9:08 ` [PATCH-RFC 1/2 v2] tile: don't panic on iomap Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-29 18:54 ` [PATCH-RFC 2/2] tile: switch to GENERIC_PCI_IOMAP Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-30 21:19 ` Chris Metcalf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111130070417.GA17781@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).