linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>,
	prarit@redhat.com, brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1]PCI: defer enablement of SRIOV BARS
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 05:53:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111208055355.19c346a8@jbarnes-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111208025039.GH19129@ram-ThinkPad-T61>

On Thu, 8 Dec 2011 10:50:39 +0800
Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 03:11:56PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > why not something more explicit like:
> > >
> > >        for (i = 0; i < DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE; i++) {
> > >                if ((i >=  PCI_IOV_RESOURCES) && (i <= PCI_IOV_RESOURCE_END))
> > >                        continue; /* skip sriov related resources */
> > >
> > >                if (dev->resource[i].flags & flags)
> > >                        bars |= (1 << i);
> > >        }
> 
> I like this approach too. Offcourse the SRIOV skipping has to be one under #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV.
> 
> Yinghai/Jesse, do you want to make a patch on top of the current jesse's to-linus
> tree or want to revert my patch and apply your fix? If it is the former, do you want me
> to make the patch?

I like the above best as well with the comment.

Can you send me a replacement patch?  I'd rather have that than some
breakage in the patches I have in my for-linus branch.

Thanks,
-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-08 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20111006210320.GA14959@us.ibm.com>
     [not found] ` <CAErSpo7b_6_AaZXW9XBx5p3-0PZJk-1jeCork__KePdzCS89OA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <1317970100.29415.305.camel@pasglop>
     [not found]     ` <CAErSpo58okGsDW4dOK4i0g_RUejkuQa=iw2uQ5HAJJZCwFtsbw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]       ` <20111007232516.GF2980@ram-ThinkPad-T61>
     [not found]         ` <1318057168.29415.333.camel@pasglop>
     [not found]           ` <20111008075353.GK2980@ram-ThinkPad-T61>
     [not found]             ` <1318060793.29415.347.camel@pasglop>
     [not found]               ` <20111102140325.004b9dad@jbarnes-desktop>
     [not found]                 ` <20111103013014.GB393@ram-ThinkPad-T61>
     [not found]                   ` <20111106023357.GB2383@ram-ThinkPad-T61>
2011-12-05 18:17                     ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] PCI:delay configuration of SRIOV capability Jesse Barnes
2011-12-05 21:25                       ` Don Dutile
2011-12-06  7:51                         ` Ram Pai
2011-12-06  9:14                           ` Don Dutile
2011-12-05 21:37                     ` Jesse Barnes
     [not found]                   ` <20111106023310.GA2383@ram-ThinkPad-T61>
2011-11-11 18:01                     ` [RFC PATCH 1/1]PCI: defer enablement of SRIOV BARS Jesse Barnes
2011-11-14  4:33                       ` Ram Pai
2011-11-14  4:56                         ` Michael Wang
2011-12-05 18:32                     ` Jesse Barnes
2011-12-07  8:22                       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-12-07  9:25                         ` Ram Pai
2011-12-07 19:33                           ` Yinghai Lu
2011-12-07 20:23                           ` Don Dutile
2011-12-07 20:35                             ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2011-12-07 22:34                               ` Don Dutile
2011-12-07 23:11                             ` Yinghai Lu
2011-12-08  2:50                               ` Ram Pai
2011-12-08 13:53                                 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2011-12-08 16:59                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-12-09 10:04                                   ` [PATCH 1/1 v2]PCI: " Ram Pai
2011-12-08 16:22                                 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1]PCI: " Don Dutile

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111208055355.19c346a8@jbarnes-desktop \
    --to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=nacc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).