From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Cc: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>, Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
Keping Chen <chenkeping@huawei.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] PCI, x86: update MMCFG information when hot-plugging PCI host bridges
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 12:26:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120524182601.GA7551@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1337745026-1180-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com>
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:50:17AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> From: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
>
> From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
>
> This patchset enhance pci_root driver to update MMCFG information when
> hot-plugging PCI root bridges. It applies to
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git pci/next-3.5
>
> -v2: split into smaller patches and skip updating MMCFG information when
> MMCFG is disabled
> -v3: add mmconf_added to simply free path, also make pci_mmconfig_insert()
> to process extra exist case --- By Yinghai
> -v4: tune arch_acpi_pci_root_add() to handle a corner case raised by Kenji
> -v5: address review comments from Bjorn and Taku, also better handle corner
> cases in arch_acpi_pci_root_add()
> -v6: get rid of arch_acpi_pci_root_xxx() by using existing hooks
> add MCFG information for host bridges on demand
> more corner cases clear up
> correctly handle condition compilation
> fix section mismatch issues
> fix a issue reported by Taku about a BIOS bug
>
> The first 4 patches in series is the same with v5.
I tried this on one of my machines. Before your patches:
ACPI: bus type pci registered
PCI: MMCONFIG for domain 0000 [bus 00-ff] at [mem 0x80000000-0x8fffffff] (base 0x80000000)
PCI: MMCONFIG at [mem 0x80000000-0x8fffffff] reserved in E820
...
ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (domain 0000 [bus 00-7e])
After:
ACPI: bus type pci registered
1) PCI: MMCONFIG for domain 0000 [bus 00-ff] at [mem 0x80000000-0x8fffffff] (base 0x80000000)
PCI: MMCONFIG at [mem 0x80000000-0x8fffffff] reserved in E820
...
ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (domain 0000 [bus 00-7e])
2) PCI: MMCONFIG for domain 0000 [bus 00-7e] at [mem 0x80000000-0x87efffff] (base 0x80000000)
3) [Firmware Bug]: PCI: MMCONFIG at [mem 0x80000000-0x87efffff] not reserved in ACPI motherboard resources
4) PCI: MMCONFIG at [mem 0x80000000-0x87efffff] reserved in E820
I really like the MMCONFIG info being associated with the host bridge in
dmesg, and I really like it being split out in /proc/iomem. That's much
cleaner than it used to be. MMCONFIG is defined by the PCIe spec, and
there are non-x86 architectures that use the same mechanism, so I can
imagine someday (not now!) making it more generic.
1): Do we really need this early MCFG scan? Conceptually it seems like we
don't need to look at MCFG until we add a host bridge or do a blind probe.
2) and 4): These should be dev_info() with the host bridge device, e.g.,
pci_root PNP0A08:00: MMCONFIG at [mem 0x80000000-0x87efffff]
Now that we can associate it with the bridge, the bus number range is
redundant. It might be useful to know whether the MMCONFIG range came from
_CBA or MCFG, if that's easy to do.
Here's I'm thinking: right now we have some message confusion -- the arch
prints window info, e.g., "pci_root PNP0A08:00: host bridge window [io
0x0000-0x03af]", and then the PCI core prints the same thing but associated
with the bus: "pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x0000-0x03af]".
I'd like this to become more uniform, and have only the core print it, but
using the host bridge device, not the bus.
3): Something seems wrong here -- this "bug" message didn't appear before,
so I don't think it should now. I haven't tried to chase this down.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-24 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-23 3:50 [PATCH v6 0/9] PCI, x86: update MMCFG information when hot-plugging PCI host bridges Jiang Liu
2012-05-23 3:50 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] PCI, x86: split out pci_mmcfg_check_reserved() for code reuse Jiang Liu
2012-05-23 3:50 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] PCI, x86: split out pci_mmconfig_alloc() " Jiang Liu
2012-05-23 3:50 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] PCI, x86: use RCU list to protect mmconfig list Jiang Liu
2012-05-23 3:50 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] PCI, x86: introduce pci_mmcfg_arch_map()/pci_mmcfg_arch_unmap() Jiang Liu
2012-05-23 3:50 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] PCI, x86: introduce pci_mmconfig_insert()/delete() for PCI root bridge hotplug Jiang Liu
2012-05-23 3:50 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] PCI, ACPI: provide MCFG address for PCI host bridges Jiang Liu
2012-05-23 3:50 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] PCI, x86: update MMCFG information when hot-plugging " Jiang Liu
2012-05-23 3:50 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] PCI, x86: add MMCFG information on demand Jiang Liu
2012-05-23 3:50 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] PCI, x86: simplify pci_mmcfg_late_insert_resources() Jiang Liu
2012-05-24 18:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2012-05-24 23:09 ` [PATCH v6 0/9] PCI, x86: update MMCFG information when hot-plugging PCI host bridges Bjorn Helgaas
2012-05-25 2:21 ` Jiang Liu
2012-05-25 10:22 ` Taku Izumi
2012-05-25 14:43 ` Jiang Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120524182601.GA7551@google.com \
--to=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=chenkeping@huawei.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).