From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] pciehp: Don't enable presence notification while surprise removal is not supported.
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:21:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120711162120.GA17988@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo5K9EqAQSKA5_YdM2WThWddJr4XDbFHr84h_MPHvSqJmg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:56:15PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:42 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> > If surprise removal is not supported, that event get dropped later.
> > So there is no point to enable that.
> >
> > Also some sick chipset have those bit flip around when the card is not present.
> > and make log full of useless warning.
>
> HP_SUPR_RM tests the Slot Capabilities "Hot-Plug Surprise" bit, which
> indicates that an adapter might be *removed* without prior
> notification (sec 7.8.9).
>
> PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PDCE is the Slot Control "Presence Detect Changed
> Enable" bit, which enables interrupts for any change in the Slot
> Status "Presence Detect State", i.e., we may get interrupts for either
> add or remove events.
>
> In interrupt_event_handler(), we drop both add and remove events if
> !HP_SUPR_RM(). Specifically, we drop *add* events if surprise
> *removal* isn't supported. That seems strange -- just from reading
> the spec, it seems that a surprise *add* could occur even if the
> "Hot-Plug Surprise" bit is not set.
>
> So I'm not convinced that we should even bother looking at the
> "Hot-Plug Surprise" bit... Maybe we'd be better off if we just
> removed that HP_SUPR_RM() test in interrupt_event_handler() and always
> called handle_surprise_event().
What bad things would happen if we did the following?
I have no way to test this, but I don't understand what benefit
there is in testing HP_SUPR_RM() here.
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
index 27f4429..4bbe257 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_ctrl.c
@@ -463,9 +463,8 @@ static void interrupt_event_handler(struct work_struct *work)
break;
case INT_PRESENCE_ON:
case INT_PRESENCE_OFF:
- if (!HP_SUPR_RM(ctrl))
- break;
- ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "Surprise Removal\n");
+ ctrl_dbg(ctrl, "Presence Detect changed (now %spresent)\n",
+ info->event_type == INT_PRESENCE_OFF ? "not " : "");
handle_surprise_event(p_slot);
break;
default:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-11 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-23 7:42 [PATCH 0/5] PCI: hotplug related misc patches Yinghai Lu
2012-06-23 7:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] PCI, acpiphp: remove not used res_lock Yinghai Lu
2012-06-23 7:42 ` [PATCH 2/5] pciehp: Don't enable presence notification while surprise removal is not supported Yinghai Lu
2012-06-26 1:26 ` Kaneshige, Kenji
2012-06-26 18:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-07-10 22:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-07-10 23:12 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-07-10 23:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-07-10 23:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-07-11 16:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2012-07-11 17:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-07-11 18:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-07-11 18:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-07-11 19:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-07-11 20:28 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-07-11 20:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-07-11 20:56 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-07-11 22:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-07-12 0:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-07-12 20:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-07-13 0:19 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-07-13 15:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-07-13 18:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-06-23 7:42 ` [PATCH 3/5] PCI, acpiphp: Merge acpiphp_debug and debug Yinghai Lu
2012-06-23 7:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] PCI, acpiphp: add is_hotplug_bridge detection Yinghai Lu
2012-07-11 15:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-07-11 17:14 ` Jason Baron
2012-07-11 19:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-07-16 16:05 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-07-17 14:14 ` Jason Baron
2012-08-15 19:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-08-20 14:35 ` Jason Baron
2012-08-22 23:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-04 20:55 ` Jason Baron
2012-06-23 7:42 ` [PATCH 5/5] PCI: add root bus children dev's res to fail list Yinghai Lu
2012-07-10 19:30 ` [PATCH 0/5] PCI: hotplug related misc patches Yinghai Lu
2012-07-11 18:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120711162120.GA17988@google.com \
--to=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).