From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Do we need asynchronous pm_runtime_get()? (was: Re: bisected regression ...)
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 21:47:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201208042147.25845.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVOdwNiSkF1_Bs-FY-PT4gqZ86j6pcr4A=Yckc0bxykgRQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday, August 03, 2012, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Hmmm. You'd probably want a version that does a "get" at the same
> > time. I suppose you would call func directly if the device was already
> > resumed, without going through the workqueue?
>
> Maybe it isn't good, the 'func' might not be run in the current context
> (irq context or some spinlock is held).
Then I'd say don't use this interface. If you have code that needs to
be run in a different context, then you have to use a work item (or
equivalent) anyway and you can do a synchronous runtime resume from there.
The problem we want to address here is when there's code that should be
run as soon as the device is active, preferably _without_ a context switch.
Thanks,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-04 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1207241312050.1164-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
[not found] ` <87r4s0opck.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
2012-07-25 4:08 ` bisected regression, v3.5 -> next-20120724: PCI PM causes USB hotplug failure Bjørn Mork
2012-07-25 4:34 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-25 9:58 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-25 13:30 ` huang ying
2012-07-25 13:58 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-25 18:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-25 20:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-25 22:36 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-26 2:38 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-26 2:38 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-26 8:54 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-26 10:35 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-26 11:02 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-26 12:04 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-26 15:03 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-26 16:24 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-27 5:35 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-27 9:11 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-30 3:15 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-30 8:08 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-30 13:31 ` huang ying
2012-07-30 16:57 ` Bjørn Mork
2012-07-31 0:22 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-30 14:19 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-31 0:24 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-31 3:18 ` Huang Ying
2012-07-31 17:07 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-27 15:03 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-27 19:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-27 19:39 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-27 19:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-28 16:12 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-28 20:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-28 21:12 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-29 13:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-29 14:55 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-29 19:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-31 20:31 ` Do we need asynchronous pm_runtime_get()? (was: Re: bisected regression ...) Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-31 21:05 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-31 21:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-31 21:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-01 14:36 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-01 21:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-02 20:16 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-02 21:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-03 2:20 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-03 3:37 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-03 14:28 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-04 19:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2012-08-04 20:25 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-04 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-04 20:48 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-04 21:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-04 22:13 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-05 15:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-06 13:30 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-06 14:47 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-07 1:35 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-07 11:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-07 15:14 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-07 15:42 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-07 16:30 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-07 20:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-07 20:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-08 2:02 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-08 18:42 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-08 20:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-09 5:55 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-09 10:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-09 10:55 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-09 19:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-10 3:19 ` Ming Lei
2012-08-10 20:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-08 22:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-06 15:48 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-06 20:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-07 12:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-07 17:15 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-07 21:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-03 14:05 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-04 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-04 20:42 ` Alan Stern
2012-08-04 20:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-08-04 19:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-29 20:12 ` bisected regression, v3.5 -> next-20120724: PCI PM causes USB hotplug failure Jassi Brar
2012-07-29 21:44 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-25 19:51 ` [PATCH] PCI / PM: Fix messages printed by acpi_pci_set_power_state() Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-07-25 20:02 ` Alan Stern
2012-07-25 20:48 ` [PATCH][update] " Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201208042147.25845.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).