From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>, Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] PCI/xen-pcifront: simplify code by hotplug safe pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot()
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:29:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120905162904.GA12653@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <503D5ABB.6010605@gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 07:56:43AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 08/29/2012 12:59 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:43:58PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> >> Following code has a race window between pci_find_bus() and pci_get_slot()
> >> if PCI hotplug operation happens between them which removes the pci_bus.
> >> So use PCI hotplug safe interface pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() instead,
> >> which also reduces code complexity.
> >
> > Has this happend in practice? Is this something one can reproduce
> > by manipulating SysFS and at the same time unplugging the PCI
> > devices?
> Hi Konrad,
> We just noticed this issue by code inspection when improving PCI
> hotplug implementation. I guess we could trigger such issue by adding
> some delay between pci_find_bus() and pci_get_slot().
> Regards!
OK. Let me test it out.
> Gerry
>
> >>
> >> struct pci_bus *pci_bus = pci_find_bus(domain, busno);
> >> struct pci_dev *pci_dev = pci_get_slot(pci_bus, devfn);
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c | 10 ++--------
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c b/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> >> index d6cc62c..def8d0b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> >> @@ -982,7 +982,6 @@ static int pcifront_detach_devices(struct pcifront_device *pdev)
> >> int err = 0;
> >> int i, num_devs;
> >> unsigned int domain, bus, slot, func;
> >> - struct pci_bus *pci_bus;
> >> struct pci_dev *pci_dev;
> >> char str[64];
> >>
> >> @@ -1032,13 +1031,8 @@ static int pcifront_detach_devices(struct pcifront_device *pdev)
> >> goto out;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - pci_bus = pci_find_bus(domain, bus);
> >> - if (!pci_bus) {
> >> - dev_dbg(&pdev->xdev->dev, "Cannot get bus %04x:%02x\n",
> >> - domain, bus);
> >> - continue;
> >> - }
> >> - pci_dev = pci_get_slot(pci_bus, PCI_DEVFN(slot, func));
> >> + pci_dev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(domain, bus,
> >> + PCI_DEVFN(slot, func));
> >> if (!pci_dev) {
> >> dev_dbg(&pdev->xdev->dev,
> >> "Cannot get PCI device %04x:%02x:%02x.%d\n",
> >> --
> >> 1.7.9.5
> >>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-05 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-28 15:43 [PATCH 0/5] Simplify code by using hotplug safe pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() Jiang Liu
2012-08-28 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] PCI/IA64: simplify code by " Jiang Liu
2012-08-28 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] PCI/vga: " Jiang Liu
2012-08-28 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] PCI/cpcihp: " Jiang Liu
2012-08-28 15:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] PCI/IOV: " Jiang Liu
2012-09-20 20:38 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-20 23:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-21 0:02 ` Jiang Liu
2012-09-21 1:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-21 2:56 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2012-09-21 6:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-09-21 14:15 ` Don Dutile
2012-09-21 15:11 ` Yinghai Lu
2012-08-28 15:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] PCI/xen-pcifront: " Jiang Liu
2012-08-28 16:59 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-28 23:56 ` Jiang Liu
2012-09-05 16:29 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2012-09-05 20:32 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-09-17 19:34 ` [PATCH 0/5] Simplify code by using " Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120905162904.GA12653@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).