From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Roland Dreier <roland@kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Yan Burman <yanb@mellanox.com>,
Jack Morgenstein <jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH repost for-3.9] pci: avoid work_on_cpu for nested SRIOV probes
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:33:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130418083347.GA16526@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130414134339.GA3050@htj.dyndns.org>
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 06:43:39AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 03:58:55PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote:
> > So the patch eliminated the lockdep warning for mlx4 nested probing
> > sequence, but introduced lockdep warning for
> > 00:13.0 PIC: Intel Corporation 7500/5520/5500/X58 I/O Hub I/OxAPIC
> > Interrupt Controller (rev 22)
>
> Oops, the patch in itself doesn't really change anything. The caller
> should use a different subclass for the nested invocation, just like
> spin_lock_nested() and friends. Sorry about not being clear.
> Michael, can you please help?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
So like this on top. Tejun, you didn't add your S.O.B and patch
description, if this helps as we expect they will be needed.
---->
pci: use work_on_cpu_nested for nested SRIOV
Snce 3.9-rc1 mlx driver started triggering a lockdep warning.
The issue is that a driver, in it's probe function, calls
pci_sriov_enable so a PF device probe causes VF probe (AKA nested
probe). Each probe in pci_device_probe which is (normally) run through
work_on_cpu (this is to get the right numa node for memory allocated by
the driver). In turn work_on_cpu does this internally:
schedule_work_on(cpu, &wfc.work);
flush_work(&wfc.work);
So if you are running probe on CPU1, and cause another
probe on the same CPU, this will try to flush
workqueue from inside same workqueue which triggers
a lockdep warning.
Nested probing might be tricky to get right generally.
But for pci_sriov_enable, the situation is actually very simple:
VFs almost never use the same driver as the PF so the warning
is bogus there.
This is hardly elegant as it might shut up some real warnings if a buggy
driver actually probes itself in a nested way, but looks to me like an
appropriate quick fix for 3.9.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
index 1fa1e48..9c836ef 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
@@ -286,9 +286,9 @@ static int pci_call_probe(struct pci_driver *drv, struct pci_dev *dev,
int cpu;
get_online_cpus();
- cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask);
- if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
- error = work_on_cpu(cpu, local_pci_probe, &ddi);
+ cpu = cpumask_first_and(cpumask_of_node(node), cpu_online_mask);
+ if (cpu != raw_smp_processor_id() && cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
+ error = work_on_cpu_nested(cpu, local_pci_probe, &ddi);
else
error = local_pci_probe(&ddi);
put_online_cpus();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-18 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-11 15:30 [PATCH repost for-3.9] pci: avoid work_on_cpu for nested SRIOV probes Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-04-11 18:05 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-11 18:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-04-11 19:04 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-11 19:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-04-11 19:20 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-11 20:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-04-11 20:41 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-11 21:52 ` Or Gerlitz
[not found] ` <516AA80F.7040505@mellanox.com>
2013-04-14 13:43 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-18 8:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2013-04-18 9:40 ` Jack Morgenstein
2013-04-18 8:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-04-18 9:57 ` Jack Morgenstein
2013-04-18 14:49 ` Or Gerlitz
2013-04-18 13:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-04-18 18:19 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-18 18:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-04-18 20:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-04-18 18:41 ` Or Gerlitz
2013-04-18 20:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130418083347.GA16526@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
--cc=roland@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yanb@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).