linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumbach@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>,
	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Roman Yepishev <roman.yepishev@gmail.com>,
	"Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
	Mike Miller <mike.miller@hp.com>,
	iss_storagedev@hp.com, Guo-Fu Tseng <cooldavid@cooldavid.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>,
	nic_swsd@realtek.com, aacraid@adaptec.com,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: is L1 really disabled in iwlwifi
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 16:52:57 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130510225257.GA10847@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo6OCyTy19u6Xaf=xr0TSDriwCD3n-oMc7eJyLzuJ9d60g@mail.gmail.com>

[+cc Rafael, other pci_disable_link_state() users]

On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 11:13:15AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumbach@gmail.com> wrote:
> > [from Bjorn's mail]
> >> In Emmanuel's case, we don't get _OSC control, so
> >> pci_disable_link_state() does nothing.
> >
> > Right, but this is true with the specific log I sent to you. Is it
> > possible that another platform  / BIOS, we *will* get _OSC control and
> > that pci_disable_link_state() will actually do something?  In that case
> > I would prefer not to remove the call to pcie_disable_link_state().
> 
> Yes, absolutely, on many platforms we will get _OSC control, and
> pci_disable_link_state() will work as expected.  The problem is that
> the driver doesn't have a good way to know whether pci_disable_link()
> did anything or not.
> 
> Today I think we have:
> 
> 1) If the BIOS grants the OS permission to control PCIe services via
> _OSC, pci_disable_link_state() works and L1 will be disabled.
> 
> 2) If the BIOS does not grant permission, pci_disable_link_state()
> does nothing and L1 may be enabled or not depending on what
> configuration the BIOS did.
> 
> If the device really doesn't work reliably when L1 is enabled, we're
> currently at the mercy of the BIOS -- if the BIOS enables L1 but
> doesn't grant us permission via _OSC, L1 will remain enabled (as it is
> on your system).

I propose the following patch.  Any comments?


commit cd11e3f87c4d2777cf8921c0454500c9baa54b46
Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Date:   Fri May 10 15:54:35 2013 -0600

    PCI/ASPM: Allow drivers to disable ASPM unconditionally
    
    Some devices have hardware problems related to using ASPM.  Drivers for
    these devices use pci_disable_link_state() to prevent their device from
    entering L0s or L1.  But on platforms where the OS doesn't have permission
    to manage ASPM, pci_disable_link_state() does nothing, and the driver has
    no way to know this.
    
    Therefore, if the BIOS enables ASPM but declines (either via the FADT
    ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM bit or the _OSC method) to allow the OS to manage it,
    the device can still use ASPM and trip over the hardware issue.
    
    This patch makes pci_disable_link_state() disable ASPM unconditionally,
    regardless of whether the OS has permission to manage ASPM in general.
    
    Reported-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumbach@gmail.com>
    Reference: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CANUX_P3F5YhbZX3WGU-j1AGpbXb_T9Bis2ErhvKkFMtDvzatVQ@mail.gmail.com
    Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57331
    Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
index d320df6..9ef4ab8 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
@@ -718,15 +718,11 @@ void pcie_aspm_powersave_config_link(struct pci_dev *pdev)
  * pci_disable_link_state - disable pci device's link state, so the link will
  * never enter specific states
  */
-static void __pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool sem,
-				     bool force)
+static void __pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool sem)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *parent = pdev->bus->self;
 	struct pcie_link_state *link;
 
-	if (aspm_disabled && !force)
-		return;
-
 	if (!pci_is_pcie(pdev))
 		return;
 
@@ -757,13 +753,13 @@ static void __pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool sem,
 
 void pci_disable_link_state_locked(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state)
 {
-	__pci_disable_link_state(pdev, state, false, false);
+	__pci_disable_link_state(pdev, state, false);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_disable_link_state_locked);
 
 void pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state)
 {
-	__pci_disable_link_state(pdev, state, true, false);
+	__pci_disable_link_state(pdev, state, true);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_disable_link_state);
 
@@ -781,7 +777,7 @@ void pcie_clear_aspm(struct pci_bus *bus)
 		__pci_disable_link_state(child, PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S |
 					 PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1 |
 					 PCIE_LINK_STATE_CLKPM,
-					 false, true);
+					 false);
 	}
 }
 

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-10 22:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-04  8:41 is L1 really disabled in iwlwifi Emmanuel Grumbach
2013-03-04 13:44 ` John W. Linville
2013-03-04 13:49 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-03-04 14:57   ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2013-03-04 15:11     ` John W. Linville
2013-03-04 15:48     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-03-04 17:58       ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2013-03-17 15:59         ` Roman Yepishev
2013-03-29 18:24         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-03-30 18:38           ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2013-03-30 21:26             ` Bjorn Helgaas
     [not found]               ` <CANUX_P2Hy02SnyYS24dyUGLv3wB3L5xkXt8Y1s+8_RG9d5ReAw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-02 11:12                 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2013-04-07 12:23                   ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2013-04-08 16:28                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
     [not found]                       ` <CANUX_P0hpx8NNvX6cJXfOZMNYN8hrEF-gzf9hBN2Uz=k0WiwgA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-04-30 10:57                         ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2013-04-30 22:45                           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-04-30 22:55                             ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-01  8:31                               ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2013-05-01 17:13                                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-05-10 22:52                                   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2013-05-11 20:26                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-11 20:22                                       ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-16 22:55                                         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-05-17  5:49                                           ` Emmanuel Grumbach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130510225257.GA10847@google.com \
    --to=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=aacraid@adaptec.com \
    --cc=cooldavid@cooldavid.org \
    --cc=egrumbach@gmail.com \
    --cc=iss_storagedev@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
    --cc=mike.miller@hp.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=roman.yepishev@gmail.com \
    --cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
    --cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).