linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] PM / Runtime: Rework the "runtime idle" helper routine
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 11:29:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130529082959.GW11878@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463685.qFyr66vqF2@vostro.rjw.lan>

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 01:29:06AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> The "runtime idle" helper routine, rpm_idle(), currently ignores
> return values from .runtime_idle() callbacks executed by it.
> 
> However, it turns out that many subsystems use the generic idle
> callback routine pm_generic_runtime_idle() which checks the return
> value of the driver's callback and executes pm_runtime_suspend() for
> the device unless that value is different from 0.  If that logic is
> moved to rpm_idle() instead, pm_generic_runtime_idle() can be dropped
> and its users will not need any .runtime_idle() callbacks any more.
> 
> Moreover, the PCI subsystem's .runtime_idle() routine,
> pci_pm_runtime_idle(), works in analogy with the generic one and if
> rpm_idle() calls rpm_suspend() after 0 has been returned by the
> .runtime_idle() callback executed by it, that routine will not be
> necessary any more and may be dropped.
> 
> To reduce overall code duplication make the changes described above.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> The patch doesn't break compilation for me, but it hasn't been tested
> otherwise.  It applies on top of the linux-pm.git tree's linux-next branch.
> 
> Thanks,
> Rafael
> 
> ---
>  Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt |    5 -----
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_device.c  |    7 +------
>  drivers/acpi/device_pm.c           |    1 -
>  drivers/amba/bus.c                 |    2 +-
>  drivers/base/platform.c            |    1 -
>  drivers/base/power/domain.c        |    1 -
>  drivers/base/power/generic_ops.c   |   23 -----------------------
>  drivers/base/power/runtime.c       |   12 +++++-------
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c             |    2 +-

i2c-core runtime PM idle still works with this patch :-)

You can add my

Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

for the i2c parts if you like.

>  drivers/mmc/core/sdio_bus.c        |    2 +-
>  drivers/pci/pci-driver.c           |   27 ---------------------------
>  drivers/spi/spi.c                  |    2 +-
>  drivers/usb/core/port.c            |    1 -
>  include/linux/pm_runtime.h         |    2 --
>  14 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-29  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-28 23:29 [PATCH RFC] PM / Runtime: Rework the "runtime idle" helper routine Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-29  8:29 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2013-05-29 14:51 ` Alan Stern
2013-05-29 22:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-30  1:05     ` Aaron Lu
2013-05-30 17:08     ` Alan Stern
2013-05-30 19:55       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-30 20:13         ` Alan Stern
2013-06-02 21:50       ` [PATCH 0/2] PM / Runtime: Rework the "runtime idle" helper routine (was: Re: [PATCH RFC] PM / Runtime: Rework the "runtime idle" helper routine) Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-02 21:52         ` [PATCH 1/2, v2] PM / Runtime: Rework the "runtime idle" helper routine Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-04  5:14           ` Aaron Lu
2013-06-04  7:15           ` Lan Tianyu
2013-06-02 21:53         ` [PATCH 2/2] PM / Runtime: Update .runtime_idle() callback documentation Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-31 19:55 ` [PATCH RFC] PM / Runtime: Rework the "runtime idle" helper routine Kevin Hilman
2013-06-02 19:44 ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130529082959.GW11878@intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).