From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([94.23.35.102]:43912 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751060Ab3FYQoX (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:44:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:44:19 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Thierry Reding , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Russell King , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Gregory Clement , Ezequiel Garcia , linux-arm , Maen Suleiman , Lior Amsalem , Thierry Reding Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 02/11] pci: use weak functions for MSI arch-specific functions Message-ID: <20130625184419.2bc14a71@skate> In-Reply-To: References: <1371660979-21588-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1371660979-21588-3-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20130620185707.GA8888@mithrandir> <20130625115552.7ebdad17@skate> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Dear Bjorn Helgaas, On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:20:33 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > Any suggestion on how to solve this particular case? > > Nope. Just leave it as-is for that case and consolidate what you can. So I keep the weak arch_*() function and the strong default_*() for this particular hook, and for all the other hooks, I only keep a weak arch_*() function. Is this what you suggest for now? Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com