linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
	Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] PCI: fix the io resource alignment calculation in pbus_size_io()
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 07:44:21 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130806134421.GD31970@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130806061924.GB10876@weiyang.vnet.ibm.com>

On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 02:19:24PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 11:58:50AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >[+cc Yinghai]
> >
> >On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >> In commit 462d9303 ("PCI: Align P2P windows using pcibios_window_alignment()"),
> >> it introduce a new method to calculate the window alignment of P2P bridge.
> >>
> >> When the io_window_1k is set,  the calculation for the io resource alignment
> >> is different from the original one. In the original logic before 462d9303,
> >> the alignment is no bigger than 4K even the io_window_1k is set. The logic
> >> introduced in 462d9303 will limit the alignment to 1k in this case.
> >>
> >> This patch fix this issue.
> >
> >Presumably this fixes a bug, but you don't say what it is.  "different
> >from the original" is not a description of a problem.  You need
> >something like "with the current code, we allocate the wrong window
> >size in situation X, or we allocate a window with incorrect alignment
> >in situation Y, etc."
> >
> 
> With current code, we allocate the wrong window size when upstream bridge
> could be 1k aligned and one of the downstream port is 4k aligned.
> 
> In this case, the "min_align" should be 4k. But the current code set
> "min_align" to 1k.

I would expect that we allocate a window with incorrect *alignment*,
not incorrect size.  If you include a dmesg log and lspci output and point
out the problem, that will avoid a lot of confusion.

Bjorn

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-06 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-02  9:31 [PATCH 0/4] optimization/fix/cleanup in pci_assign_unassigned_resources Wei Yang
2013-08-02  9:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] PCI: optimize pci_bus_get_depth() by enumerating on pci bus hierachy Wei Yang
2013-08-02  9:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI: add comment for pbus_size_mem() parameter Wei Yang
2013-08-02  9:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] PCI: trivial cleanup in pbus_size_io() Wei Yang
2013-08-02  9:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] PCI: fix the io resource alignment calculation " Wei Yang
2013-08-02 22:51   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-05 17:58   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-05 19:05     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-05 19:51       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-05 20:52         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-05 20:59           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-05 21:09             ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-05 22:21               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-06  6:15                 ` Wei Yang
2013-08-06 13:39                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-06 15:34                     ` Wei Yang
2013-08-06 17:58                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-07  2:01                         ` Wei Yang
     [not found]                 ` <20130806032227.GA7736@shangw.(null)>
2013-08-06  6:26                   ` Wei Yang
2013-08-06 13:42                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
     [not found]                 ` <52006bfc.6a5d3c0a.2753.ffffa6b7SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2013-08-06 13:35                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-06  6:19     ` Wei Yang
2013-08-06 13:44       ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2013-08-06 15:47         ` Wei Yang
2013-08-06 18:01           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-06 20:56             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-07  2:01               ` Wei Yang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-01 15:10 [PATCH 0/4] optimization/fix/cleanup in pci_assign_unassigned_resources Wei Yang
2013-07-01 15:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] PCI: fix the io resource alignment calculation in pbus_size_io() Wei Yang
2013-07-08 21:15   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-09  3:20     ` Wei Yang
2013-07-09 17:38       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-10  1:34         ` Wei Yang
2013-07-19  3:10           ` Wei Yang
2013-07-25 21:22           ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130806134421.GD31970@google.com \
    --to=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).