From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/3] PCI: tegra: Support driver unbinding
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 22:16:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130819201623.GD5191@mithrandir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520CF211.6060003@wwwdotorg.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2416 bytes --]
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 09:21:53AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/15/2013 04:34 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 03:43:40PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> On 08/13/2013 05:12 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >>> Implement the platform driver's .remove() callback to free all
> >>> resources allocated during driver setup and call
> >>> pci_common_exit() to cleanup ARM specific datastructures. Unmap
> >>> the fixed PCI I/O mapping by calling the new pci_iounmap_io()
> >>> function in the new .teardown() callback.
> >>>
> >>> Finally, no longer set the .suppress_bind_attrs field to true
> >>> to allow the driver to unbind from a device.
> >>
> >>> +static int tegra_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{
> >>> + struct tegra_pcie *pcie = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); +
> >>> struct tegra_pcie_bus *bus, *tmp; + int err; + +
> >>> pci_common_exit(&pcie->sys); + + list_for_each_entry_safe(bus,
> >>> tmp, &pcie->busses, list) { + vunmap(bus->area->addr); +
> >>> kfree(bus); + } + + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) { + err =
> >>> tegra_pcie_disable_msi(pcie); + if (err < 0) + return err; +
> >>> }
> >>
> >> Wouldn't it make sense to do that as early as possible in the
> >> function, to make sure that no MSI accidentally fires after some
> >> of the cleanup has already happened?
> >
> > I don't think that's strictly necessary in this case. After the
> > call to pci_common_exit() there are no PCI devices left, there's
> > not even a bus left. All MSI users should have cleaned up after
> > themselves.
> >
> > Given that I thought it more useful to mirror the setup done in
> > .probe() to make it clearer what's being undone (and potentially
> > what's missing).
>
> That makes sense SW-wise, but what about mis-behaving HW that triggers
> an MSI even when it's been told not to? I assume that
> tegra_pcie_disable_msi() unrequests the IRQ, hence solves that
> problem, if done early enough.
To be honest, I'm not sure about the side-effects that this will have.
tegra_pcie_disable_msi() does quite a bit more than just masking the
interrupts. It also completely removes the IRQ domain that provides the
MSI interrupts. While I haven't tried it yet I can imagine that it will
cause crashes at a later point when drivers want to disable MSI on a
device and the IRQ domain having vanished from underneath.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-19 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-13 11:12 [RFC 0/3] ARM: Allow PCI host drivers to be unloaded Thierry Reding
2013-08-13 11:12 ` [RFC 1/3] ARM: Allow unmapping of fixed PCI I/O mappings Thierry Reding
2013-08-13 11:12 ` [RFC 2/3] ARM: Introduce pci_common_exit() Thierry Reding
2013-08-13 11:12 ` [RFC 3/3] PCI: tegra: Support driver unbinding Thierry Reding
2013-08-14 21:43 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-15 10:34 ` Thierry Reding
2013-08-15 15:21 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-19 20:16 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2013-08-19 20:55 ` Stephen Warren
2013-08-19 21:52 ` Thierry Reding
2013-08-19 21:59 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130819201623.GD5191@mithrandir \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).