From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:01:04 +0200 From: Alexander Gordeev To: David Laight Cc: Mark Lord , Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ben Hutchings , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 12/29] PCI/MSI: Introduce pcim_enable_msi*() family helpers Message-ID: <20131025100103.GA317@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> References: <6bc575621ef70f72b206e4aa944acd32f1a75718.1382103786.git.agordeev@redhat.com> <20131024105158.GB13159@mtj.dyndns.org> <20131024114133.GA26610@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> <5269D5D1.60103@start.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:10:02AM +0100, David Laight wrote: > What this doesn't resolve is a driver requesting a lot of interrupts > early on and leaving none for later drivers. If this problem really exists anywhere besides pSeries? I can imagine x86 hitting lack of vectors in interrupt table when number of CPUs exceeds hundreds, but do we have this problem now? > Really the system needs to allocate the minimum number to all > drivers before giving out any extra ones - I've NFI how this > would be arranged! Do not know. The pSeries quota approach seems more reasonable to me. > David -- Regards, Alexander Gordeev agordeev@redhat.com