From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Rajat Jain <rajatjain.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org,
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@juniper.net>,
Rajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Tom Nguyen <tom.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Kristen Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@intel.com>,
Rajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pciehp: Acknowledge the spurious "cmd completed" event.
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:25:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131106002505.GC3359@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52797238.8070304@gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 02:33:28PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> In case of a spurious "cmd completed", pcie_write_cmd() does not
> clear it, but yet expects more "cmd completed" events to be generated.
> This does not happen because the previous (spurious) event has not
> been acknowledged. Fix that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatjain@juniper.net>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@juniper.net>
> ---
> This is how I saw it in action: my controller does not implement any
> hot-plug elements (LED, power ctrl, EMI etc) but still supports Command
> completed bit.
> - During initialization,
> pcie_disable_notification()
> -> pcie_write_cmd()
> -> writes to Slot control register
> -> which causes PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_CC to get set, which is not
> cleared, because IRQ is not generated (we just disabled
> notifications).
> - After some time,
> pcie_enable_notification()
> -> pcie_write_cmd()
> -> finds PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_CC is set, assumes it is spurious.
> -> Does not clear it, yet expects more command completed
> events to be generated (never happens).
I'm not sure this "cmd completed" is actually spurious. Spec section
7.8.10 is very clear that any write to Slot Control must cause a
hot-plug command to be generated (if the port is hot-plug capable).
Can you collect "lspci -vv" output for your controller? I assume
you're hitting this case in pcie_init() (added by 5808639bfa98
("pciehp: fix slow probing")):
/*
* Controller doesn't notify of command completion if the "No
* Command Completed Support" bit is set in Slot Capability
* register or the controller supports none of power
* controller, attention led, power led and EMI.
*/
if (NO_CMD_CMPL(ctrl) ||
!(POWER_CTRL(ctrl) | ATTN_LED(ctrl) | PWR_LED(ctrl) | EMI(ctrl)))
ctrl->no_cmd_complete = 1;
and we're setting "no_cmd_complete = 1" for your controller, which
keeps us from waiting for completion in pcie_write_cmd().
I'm dubious about the assertion that a controller without power
control, attention LED, power LED, or EMI can't support command
completion. I don't see anything in the spec to that effect.
Since you're seeing PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_CC=1, your controller *should*
support Command Completion notification and PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_NCCS should
be 0 (per Table 7-20), so I wonder what happens on your system if you
change pcie_init() so it leaves "ctrl->no_cmd_complete = 0" instead?
Does it work correctly then?
I know we can't just drop the "!(POWER_CTRL(ctrl) | ...)" tests
because we don't want to reintroduce the problem fixed by
5808639bfa98, but I wonder if we can find a better fix that addresses
both problems.
Bjorn
>
> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> index 5b8d749..ba8e06f 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
> @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ static int pcie_write_cmd(struct controller *ctrl, u16 cmd, u16 mask)
> }
>
> if (slot_status & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_CC) {
> + pciehp_writew(ctrl, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_CC);
> if (!ctrl->no_cmd_complete) {
> /*
> * After 1 sec and CMD_COMPLETED still not set, just
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-06 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-05 22:33 [PATCH] pciehp: Acknowledge the spurious "cmd completed" event Rajat Jain
2013-11-06 0:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2013-11-06 2:38 ` Rajat Jain
2013-11-07 21:53 ` Rajat Jain
2013-11-08 1:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-11-08 17:30 ` Rajat Jain
2013-11-08 23:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-11-11 21:26 ` Rajat Jain
2013-11-23 0:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-11-23 1:59 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-11-23 14:56 ` Rajat Jain
2013-11-23 19:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-11-25 19:03 ` Rajat Jain
2014-02-12 0:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-02-12 1:08 ` Rajat Jain
2014-02-20 7:42 ` Rajat Jain
2014-02-20 22:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-02-21 1:43 ` Rajat Jain
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-21 1:42 Rajat Jain
2014-04-24 22:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131106002505.GC3359@google.com \
--to=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=groeck@juniper.net \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kristen.c.accardi@intel.com \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rajatjain.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=rajatjain@juniper.net \
--cc=rajatxjain@gmail.com \
--cc=tom.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).