linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nishank Trivedi <nistrive@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Use pci_is_root_bus() to check for root bus
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 13:12:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131106201239.GA8971@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQU4V0waWNvMFgEjKv90KuCCQ2CYJU2UsnDP0+WDS9zb1Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:56:13AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> wrote:
> 
> > commit dfb66fee4715c747a94abd45c20fbe302b10e49c
> > Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > Date:   Wed Nov 6 10:11:48 2013 -0700
> >
> >     PCI: Add pci_upstream_bridge()
> >
> >     This adds a pci_upstream_bridge() interface to find the PCI-to-PCI bridge
> >     upstream from a device.  If the device is on a root bus, i.e., the upstream
> >     bridge is a host bridge instead of a PCI bridge, this returns NULL.  If the
> >     device is a VF, this returns the bridge upstream from the PF corresponding
> >     to the VF.  This is important for VFs on virtual buses, where
> >     "dev->bus->self == NULL".
> >
> >     Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> > index d3a888a..e09d19a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> > @@ -480,6 +480,18 @@ static inline bool pci_is_root_bus(struct pci_bus *pbus)
> >         return !(pbus->parent);
> >  }
> >
> > +static inline struct pci_dev *pci_upstream_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > +       if (pci_is_root_bus(dev->bus))
> > +               return NULL;
> > +
> > +       dev = pci_physfn(dev);
> > +       if (pci_is_root_bus(dev->bus))
> > +               return NULL;
> 
> Maybe we can drop the first pci_is_root_bus() checking.
> for physfn, pci_physfn will return it's self.

Yep, that makes sense, thanks.  I incorporated that change.

> > +
> > +       return dev->bus->self;
> > +}
> > +
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> >  static inline bool pci_dev_msi_enabled(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
> >  {
> > commit 4e5415f02e32c85e902cd9692eab18200e14b347
> > Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > Date:   Wed Nov 6 10:00:51 2013 -0700
> >
> >     PCI: Enable upstream bridges even for VFs on virtual buses
> >
> >     Previously we enabled the upstream PCI-to-PCI bridge only when
> >     "dev->bus->self != NULL".  In the case of a VF on a virtual bus, where
> >     "bus->self == NULL", we didn't enable the upstream bridge.
> >
> >     This fixes that by enabling the upstream bridge of the PF corresponding to
> >     the VF.
> >
> >     Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > index ac40f90..744dc26 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> > @@ -1150,10 +1150,8 @@ static void pci_enable_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >  {
> >         int retval;
> >
> > -       if (!dev)
> > -               return;
> > -
> > -       pci_enable_bridge(dev->bus->self);
> > +       if (!pci_is_root_bus(dev->bus))
> > +               pci_enable_bridge(pci_upstream_bridge(dev));
> >
> >         if (pci_is_enabled(dev)) {
> >                 if (!dev->is_busmaster)
> > @@ -1188,7 +1186,8 @@ static int pci_enable_device_flags(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned long flags)
> >         if (atomic_inc_return(&dev->enable_cnt) > 1)
> >                 return 0;               /* already enabled */
> >
> > -       pci_enable_bridge(dev->bus->self);
> > +       if (!pci_is_root_bus(dev->bus))
> > +               pci_enable_bridge(pci_upstream_bridge(dev));
> >
> >         /* only skip sriov related */
> >         for (i = 0; i <= PCI_ROM_RESOURCE; i++)
> 
> still have problem.
> 
> pci_upstream_bridge() could return NULL. so later pci_enable_bridge()
> referring dev->bus could panic, as you remove !dev checking.

pci_upstream_bridge(dev) can only return NULL if dev is on a root bus,
and we never call pci_enable_bridge() in that case.  So I don't see
the problem.

Bjorn

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-06 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-05 23:29 [PATCH] PCI: Use pci_is_root_bus() to check for root bus Bjorn Helgaas
2013-11-06  3:39 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-11-06 18:15   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-11-06 19:56     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-11-06 20:12       ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2013-11-06 20:33         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-11-06 20:46           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-11-07  0:28             ` Yinghai Lu
2013-11-07 22:03               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-11-07  3:00     ` Wei Yang
2013-11-07 21:59       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-11-08  1:35         ` Wei Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131106201239.GA8971@google.com \
    --to=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nistrive@cisco.com \
    --cc=weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).