From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: imx6: Remove unneeded 'goto err'
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 00:49:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201312050049.31019.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5B26G0nAqjAsuR4mkRMtfE6jbSQHfa=ZSLGGEbOP-1smQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wednesday, December 04, 2013 at 07:31:57 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 6:08 AM, Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> > I am a bit worried about unwinding of the installation of the DABT hook:
> >
> > 424 /* Added for PCI abort handling */
> > 425 hook_fault_code(16 + 6, imx6q_pcie_abort_handler, SIGBUS, 0,
> > 426 "imprecise external abort");
> >
> > This is not handled in the fail path. Instead of this patch, would it be
> > possible for you to fix the failpath to take this part into
> > consideration?
>
> IMHO this would be subject of a separate patch. This one does not
> change any current behavior.
The current behavior is botched then. If this would be compilable as a module
and you removed this module, this hook would also cease to exist and if
something triggered this type of DABT, the whole kernel would explode. I suppose
noone will compile this as a module in the first place, but let's play safe ;-)
> > Another option, and I think even a better one, would be to move this DABT
> > handler installation just before imx6_add_pcie_port() call. You'd still
> > need to handle it's de-installation in remove(), but you won't have so
> > many functions in probe() goto-ing to fail path.
>
> How do we 'uninstall' this DABT handler installation?
I think you should call hook_fault_code() again, but this time you should
specify the old values that were in the fault handler table before.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-04 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-02 3:39 [PATCH 1/2] PCI: imx6: Remove unneeded check of platform_get_resource() Fabio Estevam
2013-12-02 3:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: imx6: Remove unneeded 'goto err' Fabio Estevam
2013-12-02 8:08 ` Marek Vasut
2013-12-04 18:31 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-12-04 23:49 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2013-12-05 0:10 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-12-09 22:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-12-10 5:54 ` Jingoo Han
2013-12-10 18:48 ` Marek Vasut
2013-12-02 8:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: imx6: Remove unneeded check of platform_get_resource() Marek Vasut
2013-12-09 21:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201312050049.31019.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).