From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Cc: 'Bjorn Helgaas' <bhelgaas@google.com>,
'Valentine Barshak' <valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com>,
'Wei Yongjun' <weiyj.lk@gmail.com>,
'Wei Yongjun' <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, 'Magnus Damm' <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
'Kuninori Morimoto' <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: rcar: fix return value check in rcar_pci_probe()
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:30:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131211023006.GN19992@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001001cef480$73896b20$5a9c4160$%han@samsung.com>
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:46:17AM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Sunday, December 08, 2013 7:50 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:40:28AM +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> > > From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> > >
> > > In case of error, the function devm_ioremap_resource() returns ERR_PTR()
> > > and never returns NULL. The NULL test in the return value check should
> > > be replaced with IS_ERR().
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn>
> >
> > Applied with Jingoo's reviewed-by to pci/host-rcar for v3.14, thanks!
> >
> > For drivers/pci/host/*, I normally look for an ack from the responsible
> > person, but this patch is trivial enough that I'm fine taking it without
> > that. But for more significant changes, I don't have any notes about who
> > should own pci-rcar-gen2.c. Valentine could be a candidate since he added
> > it in the first place? Or Jingoo?
>
> (+cc Simon Horman, Magnus Damm, Kuninori Morimoto, linux-sh mailing-list)
>
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> I think that Valentine could be a candidate, because he is an author.
> However, pci-rcar-gen2.c is working on Renesas SoC, so, it may be
> necessary to get ACK from Renesas people such as Simon Horman,
> Magnus Damm, and Kuninori Morimoto.
>
> Simon Horman, Magnus Damm, and Kuninori Morimoto,
> Who is a proper person responsible for RCar Gen PCIe driver?
> (drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c)
Good question.
My feeling is that as it relates to Renesas ARM SoCs that
responsibility at least in part defaults to the Renesas ARM SoC
maintainers, Magnus and myself.
So I think it would be best if the following were CCed on any patches
to this driver:
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
I would not be opposed for there being a MAINTAINERS file entry to that effect.
I will let Valentine volunteer himself if he wants to.
>
> Best regards,
> Jingoo Han
>
> >
> > Bjorn
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c
> > > index cbaa5c4..96d1182 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-rcar-gen2.c
> > > @@ -276,8 +276,8 @@ static int __init rcar_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >
> > > cfg_res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > > reg = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, cfg_res);
> > > - if (!reg)
> > > - return -ENODEV;
> > > + if (IS_ERR(reg))
> > > + return PTR_ERR(reg);
> > >
> > > mem_res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
> > > if (!mem_res || !mem_res->start)
> > >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-11 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-19 3:40 [PATCH] PCI: rcar: fix return value check in rcar_pci_probe() Wei Yongjun
2013-11-19 7:05 ` Jingoo Han
2013-12-07 22:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-12-09 1:46 ` Jingoo Han
2013-12-11 2:30 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2013-12-13 12:06 ` Valentine
2013-12-13 17:00 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131211023006.GN19992@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=weiyj.lk@gmail.com \
--cc=yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).