From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
Mark Lord <kernel@start.ca>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] PCI/MSI: Introduce pci_auto_enable_msi*() family helpers
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:23:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131218132349.GA29552@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131218003002.GA15119@google.com>
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 05:30:02PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
Hi Bjorn,
Thank you for the review!
Sorry for a heavy skipping - I just wanted to focus on a principal
moment in your suggestion and then go on with the original note.
> I only see five users of pci_enable_msi_block() (nvme, ath10k, wil6210,
> ipr, vfio); we can easily convert those to use pci_enable_msi_range() and
> then remove pci_enable_msi_block().
> It would be good if pci_enable_msix() could be implemented in terms of
> pci_enable_msix_range(nvec, nvec), with a little extra glue to handle the
> positive return values.
So you want to get rid of the tri-state "low-level" pci_enable_msi_block()
and pci_enable_msix(), right? I believe we can not do this, since we need
to support a non-standard hardware which (a) can not be asked any arbitrary
number of vectors within a range and (b) needs extra magic to enable MSI
operation.
I.e. below is a snippet from a real device driver Mark Lord has sent in a
previous conversation:
xx_disable_all_irqs(dev);
do {
if (nvec < 2)
xx_prep_for_1_msix_vector(dev);
else if (nvec < 4)
xx_prep_for_2_msix_vectors(dev);
else if (nvec < 8)
xx_prep_for_4_msix_vectors(dev);
else if (nvec < 16)
xx_prep_for_8_msix_vectors(dev);
else
xx_prep_for_16_msix_vectors(dev);
nvec = pci_enable_msix(dev->pdev, dev->irqs, dev->num_vectors);
} while (nvec > 0);
The same probably could have been done with pci_enable_msix_range(nvec, nvec)
call and checking for -ENOSPC errno, but IMO it would be less graceful and
reliable, since -ENOSPC might come from anywhere.
IOW, I believe we need to keep the door open for custom MSI-enablement (loop)
implementations.
--
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-18 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-16 8:34 [PATCH v4 0/9] PCI/MSI: Introduce pci_auto_enable_msi*() family helpers Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-16 8:34 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] PCI/MSI/s390: Fix single MSI only check Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-16 8:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] PCI/MSI/s390: Remove superfluous check of MSI type Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-16 8:34 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] PCI/MSI: Fix return value when populate_msi_sysfs() failed Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-16 8:34 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] PCI/MSI: Return -ENOSYS for unimplemented interfaces, not -1 Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-16 8:34 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] PCI/MSI: Make pci_enable_msi/msix() 'nvec' argument type as int Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-16 8:34 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] PCI/MSI: Factor out pci_get_msi_vec_count() interface Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-18 0:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-12-16 8:35 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] PCI/MSI: Get rid of pci_enable_msi_block_auto() interface Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-16 8:35 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] PCI/MSI: Introduce pci_get_msix_vec_count() interface Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-16 8:35 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] PCI/MSI: Introduce pci_auto_enable_msi*() family helpers Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-18 0:30 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-12-18 13:23 ` Alexander Gordeev [this message]
2013-12-18 18:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-12-19 13:42 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-19 13:47 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-19 21:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-12-20 9:04 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-20 13:28 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-20 10:28 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-23 14:44 ` Alexander Gordeev
2013-12-23 17:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-12-19 22:30 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] " Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131218132349.GA29552@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com \
--to=agordeev@redhat.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kernel@start.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).