linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guo Chao <yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jack Morgenstein <jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Cc: Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@google.com, amirv@mellanox.com, ogerlitz@mellanox.com,
	eugenia@mellanox.com, Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@au1.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: mlx4_core probe error after applying Yinghai's patch
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:19:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140114111947.GA9083@yanx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140114122532.0e2b6a64@jpm-OptiPlex-GX620>

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:25:32PM +0200, Jack Morgenstein wrote:
> I suspect one of the following scenarios:
> 
> 1. BAR 0 contains a "PPF Selection" (i.e., ownership) semaphore:  The first PF probe which
> reads the semaphore "acquires" it (i.e., the first read grabs the semaphore (the read returns zero).
> Subsequent reads return non-zero.  When the PF driver is unloaded, it calls "mlx4_free_ownership()",

The read returns 0x1000000. Does it look like a typical value from a
second read?

> which writes a zero into the semaphore dword, so that the next read will return zero.
> 
> In this scenario, initialization of the "PPF selection" semaphore to zero has been compromised somehow, so that
> even the first read attempt returns a non-zero value.  In this scenario, note that the ioremap DID succeed, or
> we would see the "Failed to obtain ownership bit" message in the error log.  Maybe pre-fetching has something
> to do with this? (i.e., maybe if the BAR is not prefetched, the initial value of the semaphore is compromised).
> 

BAR 0 itself is a 64-bit non-prefetchable BAR and not effected by the
patch. It's ROM BAR moved from prefetchable window to non-prefetchable
window. Another change can be seen is the relative position of BAR0 and
ROM BAR.

Thanks,
Guo Chao

> 2. For some reason the same PF is being probed twice by the
> kernel.  In this case the second probe attempt fails because the PF has
> already been probed once.
> 
> This is the reason that I want to see the entire log -- to see if
> indeed the device is being "double-probed"
> 
> -Jack
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-14 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-14  6:22 mlx4_core probe error after applying Yinghai's patch Wei Yang
2014-01-14  7:55 ` Or Gerlitz
2014-01-14  8:27   ` Wei Yang
2014-01-14  8:39     ` Or Gerlitz
2014-01-14  8:52       ` Wei Yang
2014-01-14  8:50 ` Jack Morgenstein
2014-01-14  9:15   ` Wei Yang
2014-01-14 10:25     ` Jack Morgenstein
2014-01-14 11:19       ` Guo Chao [this message]
     [not found]       ` <52d51b4c.c413ec0a.290f.03c3SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
2014-01-14 11:21         ` Jack Morgenstein
     [not found]   ` <20140114103712.GD27684@richard>
     [not found]     ` <20140114132340.50df7d6f@jpm-OptiPlex-GX620>
     [not found]       ` <52d52032.4981e00a.3dcc.ffff81fdSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
     [not found]         ` <20140115094113.64ca756e@jpm-OptiPlex-GX620>
     [not found]           ` <1389772791.6933.84.camel@pasglop>
     [not found]             ` <52d653d3.8425e00a.76d0.1e60SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com>
     [not found]               ` <20140115160204.24a44af0@jpm-OptiPlex-GX620>
     [not found]                 ` <20140116020946.GA8702@richard>
     [not found]                   ` <20140116021429.GB8702@richard>
2014-01-29  8:50                     ` Or Gerlitz
2014-01-30  7:08                       ` Wei Yang
2014-01-30  8:09                         ` Or Gerlitz
2014-01-14  8:54 ` Jack Morgenstein
2014-01-14  9:16   ` Wei Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140114111947.GA9083@yanx \
    --to=yan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=amirv@mellanox.com \
    --cc=benh@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=eugenia@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ogerlitz@mellanox.com \
    --cc=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).