From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: MVEBU: Use Device ID and revision from underlying endpoint
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 17:21:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140205172110.22507687@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1391597749-29807-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch>
Dear Andrew Lunn,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 11:55:49 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Marvell SoCs place the SoC number into the PCIe endpoint device ID.
> The SoC stepping is placed into the PCIe revision. The old plat-orion
> PCIe driver allowed this information to be seen in user space with a
> simple lspci command.
>
> The new driver places a virtual PCI-PCI bridge on top of these
> endpoints. It has its own hard coded PCI device ID. Thus it is no
> longer possible to see what the SoC is using lspci.
>
> When initializing the PCI-PCI bridge, set its device ID and revision
> from the underlying endpoint, thus restoring this functionality.
> Debian would like to use this in order to aid installing the correct
> DTB file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c | 11 ++---------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
I have two comments below, though.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
> index 13478ecd4113..0e79665afd44 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
> @@ -60,14 +60,6 @@
> #define PCIE_DEBUG_CTRL 0x1a60
> #define PCIE_DEBUG_SOFT_RESET BIT(20)
>
> -/*
> - * This product ID is registered by Marvell, and used when the Marvell
> - * SoC is not the root complex, but an endpoint on the PCIe bus. It is
> - * therefore safe to re-use this PCI ID for our emulated PCI-to-PCI
> - * bridge.
> - */
> -#define MARVELL_EMULATED_PCI_PCI_BRIDGE_ID 0x7846
> -
> /* PCI configuration space of a PCI-to-PCI bridge */
> struct mvebu_sw_pci_bridge {
> u16 vendor;
> @@ -388,7 +380,8 @@ static void mvebu_sw_pci_bridge_init(struct mvebu_pcie_port *port)
>
> bridge->class = PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI;
> bridge->vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_MARVELL;
This could also have been replaced by:
bridge->vendor = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_DEV_ID_OFF) & 0xff;
> - bridge->device = MARVELL_EMULATED_PCI_PCI_BRIDGE_ID;
> + bridge->device = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_DEV_ID_OFF) >> 16;
> + bridge->revision = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_DEV_REV_OFF) & 0xff;
On Armada 370 and XP, this field is apparently always 0x0, so not very
useful. But if it's useful on other mvebu SoCs, that's fine, it's just
an informative field anyway.
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-05 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-05 10:55 [PATCH] PCI: MVEBU: Use Device ID and revision from underlying endpoint Andrew Lunn
2014-02-05 16:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2014-02-05 16:54 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-02-05 17:03 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-02-05 18:42 ` Jason Cooper
2014-02-12 21:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140205172110.22507687@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).