From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
Richard Zhu <r65037@freescale.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: imx6: Fix link_up detection
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:36:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201402120836.16221.marex@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392190075-23204-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 at 08:27:55 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
+CC Troy Kisky, since I think he submitted something similar some time ago
already.
Otherwise I agree this happens.
> This is broken since:
> | commit e6daf4a5e1b813bc7f85507ec83b8c2452c121e6
> | Author: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> | Date: Thu Dec 12 22:49:59 2013 +0100
> |
> | PCI: imx6: Report "link up" only after link training completes
> |
> | While waiting for the PHY to report the PCIe link is up, we might hit
> | a situation where the link training is still in progress, while the
> | PHY already reports the link is up. Add additional check for this
> | condition.
> |
> | Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> | Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> | Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
>
> The problem is: Before the above commit only the
> PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_XMLH_LINK_UP bit was used to determine whether the link
> is up or not. Since the above commit also the
> PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_XMLH_LINK_IN_TRAINING is used. This means a link still
> being trained is as link down.
> The designware driver changes the PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE bit in
> dw_pcie_host_init() which causes the link to be retrained. During the next
> call to dw_pcie_rd_conf() the link is then reported being down and the
> function returns PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND resulting in nonfunctioning
> PCIe.
>
> This patch fixes this by waiting until the link training has finished
> before testing the PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_XMLH_LINK_UP bit. This is hardly the
> correct solution, but I don't know what should be done instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Richard Zhu <r65037@freescale.com> (maintainer:PCI DRIVER FOR IMX6)
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> (maintainer:PCI DRIVER FOR IMX6)
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (supporter:PCI SUBSYSTEM)
> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
> index 866bdc7..9b6b501 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -449,6 +449,7 @@ static void imx6_pcie_reset_phy(struct pcie_port *pp)
> static int imx6_pcie_link_up(struct pcie_port *pp)
> {
> u32 rc, ltssm, rx_valid;
> + int count = 1000;
>
> /*
> * Test if the PHY reports that the link is up and also that
> @@ -458,8 +459,13 @@ static int imx6_pcie_link_up(struct pcie_port *pp)
> * as well here.
> */
> rc = readl(pp->dbi_base + PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1);
> - if ((rc & PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_XMLH_LINK_UP) &&
> - !(rc & PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_XMLH_LINK_IN_TRAINING))
> + while (rc & PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_XMLH_LINK_IN_TRAINING) {
> + if (!count--)
> + return 0;
> + rc = readl(pp->dbi_base + PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1);
> + }
> +
> + if (rc & PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_XMLH_LINK_UP)
> return 1;
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-12 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-12 7:27 [PATCH] PCI: imx6: Fix link_up detection Sascha Hauer
2014-02-12 7:36 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2014-02-13 18:29 ` Troy Kisky
2014-02-13 18:41 ` Marek Vasut
2014-02-14 6:41 ` Sascha Hauer
2014-02-14 19:25 ` Troy Kisky
2014-02-18 21:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-02-19 8:20 ` Sascha Hauer
2014-02-19 8:27 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201402120836.16221.marex@denx.de \
--to=marex@denx.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=r65037@freescale.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=troy.kisky@boundarydevices.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).