From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from 8bytes.org ([85.214.48.195]:58515 "EHLO mail.8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757289AbaCDPGX (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Mar 2014 10:06:23 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.8bytes.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F289312B27B for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:06:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:06:17 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Bill Sumner Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com, bhe@redhat.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, alex.williamson@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ddutile@redhat.com, ishii.hironobu@jp.fujitsu.com, bhelgaas@google.com, doug.hatch@hp.com, zhenhua@hp.com Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/6] Crashdump Accepting Active IOMMU Message-ID: <20140304150611.GE2799@8bytes.org> References: <1389391652-52422-1-git-send-email-bill.sumner@hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1389391652-52422-1-git-send-email-bill.sumner@hp.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Bill, On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 03:07:26PM -0700, Bill Sumner wrote: > Bill Sumner (6): > Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Flags-and-Prototype > Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Utility-functions > Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Domain-Interfaces > Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Copy-Translations > Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Debug-Print-IOMMU > Crashdump-Accepting-Active-IOMMU-Call-From-Mainline > > drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 1293 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 1225 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-) This is a pretty big change, before merging I would like to get more eyes on it. Please make sure you get more reviews on the code and the general concept. A few things I noticed while looking at it: * You put a lot of code into #define CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP. Isn't the same approach necessary to for KEXEC? * Please get rid of all the pr_debug stuff. * I think it makes sense to put the functions to access the IOMMU configuration values of the old kernel into a new file. This is better than adding over 1000 new lines to intel-iommu.c * I have seen your new single-patch for this change. A single patch with more than 1200 changed lines is not something anyone is willing to review. Please split the patches again in a meaningful and bisectable way. Thanks, Joerg