From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: "Neil Greatorex" <neil@fatboyfat.co.uk>,
"Willy Tarreau" <w@1wt.eu>,
"Matthew Minter" <matthew_minter@xyratex.com>,
"Gerlando Falauto" <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
"Gregory Clément" <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
"Ezequiel Garcia" <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Tawfik Bayouk" <tawfik@marvell.com>,
"Lior Amsalem" <alior@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: Fixing PCIe issues on Armada XP
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:12:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140410201201.GA12661@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140410200153.46669e0c@skate>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3180 bytes --]
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 08:01:53PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > Can you run Neil's patch and see if your system behaves the same?
> > Specifically that the link eventually goes down after
> > mvebu_pcie_set_local_dev_nr ?
> >
> > I couldn't find any case where the BDF leaks below the TLP layer, and
> > the spec is very clear that the assigned BDF can change at run time,
> > so I don't have an explanation for why the link reset is happening.
> > Do you have a contact at Marvell that might shed some light on that
> > behavior?
>
> There was a potential explanation about the mvebu-soc-id driver that
> enables the clock and then disables it, before the pci-mvebu driver.
> This is different that what was happening before, where the pci-mvebu
> driver was the only one to enable the clock, which was already enabled
> by the bootloader. So if the clock takes some time to stabilize, the
> introduction of mvebu-soc-id may lead to problems.
Oh, that certainly sounds like a potential problem. Disabling the
clock will certainly cause 'interesting' effects on the PEX, depending
on exactly what it does it could confuse the link partner (trigger a
timeout based retrain?).
Gating the clock without disabling the Phy first does sound like a
bad idea..
Neil, does this do anything for you?
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/mvebu-soc-id.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/mvebu-soc-id.c
index f3b325f..e0a032f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/mvebu-soc-id.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/mvebu-soc-id.c
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int __init mvebu_soc_id_init(void)
iounmap(pci_base);
res_ioremap:
- clk_disable_unprepare(clk);
+// clk_disable_unprepare(clk);
clk_err:
of_node_put(child);
> But I'm not entirely convinced by this, because in my testing, I saw:
>
> * Enable the clock
> * Values in the PCI configuration space are correct (like
> vendor/product ID)
> * mvebu_pcie_set_local_dev_nr()
> * Values in the PCI configuration space are no longer correct, unless
> you wait a little bit.
Were you reading the configuation space through the MMIO mapping or
through the configuration indirection?
In any event, turning on the clock should almost certainly be
accompanied by a phy reset sequence to get both link ends on the same
page.
Attached is a rough, untested patch along those lines.
> > That does sound like more mbus troubles.
>
> Interestingly, the problem occurred when I was plugging a SATA PCIe
> card. And regardless of whether the SATA PCIe card is present or not,
> the MBus mappings for the IGB are exactly the same.
Maybe something wrong with mbus window index 13?
Any change if you use other windows?
--- a/drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/mvebu-mbus.c
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static int mvebu_mbus_alloc_window(struct mvebu_mbus_state *mbus,
int win;
if (remap == MVEBU_MBUS_NO_REMAP) {
- for (win = mbus->soc->num_remappable_wins;
+ for (win = 0;
win < mbus->soc->num_wins; win++)
if (mvebu_mbus_window_is_free(mbus, win))
return mvebu_mbus_setup_window(mbus, win, base,
Jason
[-- Attachment #2: pex-reset.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1897 bytes --]
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
index 0d638b7..7b7d19a 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
#include <linux/of_pci.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
/*
* PCIe unit register offsets.
@@ -973,6 +974,7 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
for_each_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, child) {
struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = &pcie->ports[i];
enum of_gpio_flags flags;
+ bool enabled;
if (!of_device_is_available(child))
continue;
@@ -1044,6 +1046,9 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
continue;
}
+ // Does this work on MVEBU?
+ enabled = __clk_is_enabled(port->clk);
+
ret = clk_prepare_enable(port->clk);
if (ret)
continue;
@@ -1057,7 +1062,35 @@ static int mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
continue;
}
- mvebu_pcie_set_local_dev_nr(port, 1);
+ if (!enabled) {
+ u32 reg;
+ unsigned int tries;
+
+ /* The clock is being turned on for the first time, do
+ * a PHY reset
+ */
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev,
+ "PCIe%d.%d: performing link reset\n",
+ port->port, port->lane);
+ reg = mvebu_readl(port, PCIE_CTRL_OFF);
+ mvebu_writel(port,
+ reg & ~BIT(30), // Conf_TrainingDisable
+ PCIE_CTRL_OFF);
+ do {
+ udelay(100); // Guess?
+ } while (mvebu_pcie_link_up(port));
+ mvebu_pcie_set_local_dev_nr(port, 1);
+ mvebu_writel(port, reg | ~BIT(30), PCIE_CTRL_OFF);
+
+ for (tries = 0;
+ !mvebu_pcie_link_up(port) && tries != 100; tries++)
+ udelay(100);
+ } else {
+ /* We expect the bootloader has setup the port and
+ * waited for the link to go up
+ */
+ mvebu_pcie_set_local_dev_nr(port, 1);
+ }
port->dn = child;
spin_lock_init(&port->conf_lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-10 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-10 16:19 Fixing PCIe issues on Armada XP Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-10 16:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-04-10 18:01 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-10 20:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2014-04-10 21:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-10 21:56 ` Neil Greatorex
2014-04-10 22:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-04-10 22:15 ` Neil Greatorex
2014-04-11 10:23 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-11 16:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-04-11 17:21 ` Matthew Minter
2014-04-11 17:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-04-18 13:02 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-22 17:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-04-18 12:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-22 17:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-04-10 17:10 ` Willy Tarreau
2014-04-10 18:02 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-10 23:13 ` Willy Tarreau
2014-04-10 23:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-04-11 6:23 ` Willy Tarreau
2014-04-10 18:20 ` Neil Greatorex
2014-04-10 21:07 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-11 14:32 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-04-11 15:57 ` Neil Greatorex
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140410201201.GA12661@obsidianresearch.com \
--to=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=alior@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=gerlando.falauto@keymile.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew_minter@xyratex.com \
--cc=neil@fatboyfat.co.uk \
--cc=tawfik@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).