From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ig0-f179.google.com ([209.85.213.179]:62969 "EHLO mail-ig0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751352AbaDOSaw (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2014 14:30:52 -0400 Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hl10so103593igb.12 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 11:30:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 12:30:48 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Lucas Stach Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jingoo Han , Simon Horman , Shawn Guo , Stephen Warren , Ben Dooks , Kukjin Kim , Thierry Reding , Arnd Bergmann , kernel@pengutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] PCI: tegra: use new OF interrupt mapping when possible Message-ID: <20140415182651.GA17721@google.com> References: <1394025951-32438-1-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> <1394025951-32438-3-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> <20140404165559.GE9007@google.com> <1397556454.4574.13.camel@weser.hi.pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1397556454.4574.13.camel@weser.hi.pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:07:34PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > Am Freitag, den 04.04.2014, 10:55 -0600 schrieb Bjorn Helgaas: > > On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 02:25:47PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > > > This is the recommended method of doing the IRQ > > > mapping. For old devicetrees we fall back to the > > > previous practice. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach > > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > > > Applied with Stephen's Tested-by to my pending/host-tegra branch. I'll > > rebase and rename it after v3.15-rc1, and I think we can squeeze it into > > v3.15 shortly after that. Thanks. > > > > Are you still planning to push this into 3.15, or has this slipped to > 3.16? Yes, I'm hoping to put them in v3.15. I assume these actually fix something, e.g., we need these changes to boot with new devicetrees, or something? The changelogs don't make it clear that these are fixes, and I want to heed Linus' guidance: "Anyway, because -rc1 is already pretty darn big, I do *not* want to hear about 'sorry this missed the window, can I still sneak in'. Fixes only." I should have applied these sooner to make the merge window; I apologize for that. Anyway, if you outline what these fix, I'll update the changelogs in my tree. Bjorn