Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] Add support for PCI in AArch64

[Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>]

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 09:58:28AM +0100, Sandeepa Prabhu wrote:
> On 14 March 2014 21:04, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch adds support for PCI to AArch64. It is based on my v7 patch
> > that adds support for creating generic host bridge structure from
> > device tree. With that in place, I was able to boot a platform that
> > has PCIe host bridge support and use a PCIe network card.
> Hi Liviu,
> 
> Are these patches (including your other patchset for device tree host
> bridge support ) available on a public git repo I can checkout from?

Yes, I have pushed them into git://linux-arm.org/linux-ld.git

Best regards,
Liviu

> 
> Thanks,
> ~Sandeepa
> 
> >
> > I have dropped the RFC tag from the subject as I now have the ambitious goal
> > of trying to get it mainlined.
> >
> > Changes from v6:
> >   - Guard the pci_domain_nr() inline implementation with #ifdef CONFIG_PCI as
> >     to avoid conflict with default empty version present in include/linux/pci.h.
> >     Thanks to Jingoo Han for catching this.
> >
> > Changes from v5:
> >   - Removed pcibios_fixup_bridge_ranges() as the week default version is fine.
> >   - Removed the ALIGN() call in pcibios_align_resource()
> >   - Stopped exporting pcibios_align_resource()
> >
> > Changes from v4:
> >   - Fixed the pci_domain_nr() implementation for arm64. Now we use
> >     find_pci_host_bride() to find the host bridge before we retrieve
> >     the domain number.
> >
> > Changes from v3:
> >   - Added Acks accumulated so far ;)
> >   - Still carrying Catalin's patch for moving the PCI_IO_BASE until it
> >     lands in linux-next or mainline, in order to ease applying the series
> >
> > Changes from v2:
> >   - Implement an arch specific version of pci_register_io_range() and
> >     pci_address_to_pio().
> >   - Return 1 from pci_proc_domain().
> >
> > Changes from v1:
> >   - Added Catalin's patch for moving the PCI_IO_BASE location and extend
> >     its size to 16MB
> >   - Integrated Arnd's version of pci_ioremap_io that uses a bitmap for
> >     keeping track of assigned IO space and returns an io_offset. At the
> >     moment the code is added in arch/arm64 but it can be moved in drivers/pci.
> >   - Added a fix for the generic ioport_map() function when !CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP
> >     as suggested by Arnd.
> >
> > v6 thread here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/5/41
> > v5 thread here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/4/307
> > v4 thread here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/3/298
> > v3 thread here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/28/211
> > v2 thread here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/27/255
> > v1 thread here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/3/389
> >
> >
> > The API used is different from the one used by ARM architecture. There is
> > no pci_common_init_dev() function and no hw_pci structure, as that is no
> > longer needed. Once the last signature is added to the legal agreement, I
> > will post the host bridge driver code that I am using. Meanwhile, here
> > is an example of what the probe function looks like, posted as an example:
> >
> > static int myhostbridge_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> >         int err;
> >         struct device_node *dev;
> >         struct pci_host_bridge *bridge;
> >         struct myhostbridge_port *pp;
> >         resource_size_t lastbus;
> >
> >         dev = pdev->dev.of_node;
> >
> >         if (!of_device_is_available(dev)) {
> >                 pr_warn("%s: disabled\n", dev->full_name);
> >                 return -ENODEV;
> >         }
> >
> >         pp = kzalloc(sizeof(struct myhostbridge_port), GFP_KERNEL);
> >         if (!pp)
> >                 return -ENOMEM;
> >
> >         bridge = of_create_pci_host_bridge(&pdev->dev, &myhostbridge_ops, pp);
> >         if (IS_ERR(bridge)) {
> >                 err = PTR_ERR(bridge);
> >                 goto bridge_create_fail;
> >         }
> >
> >         err = myhostbridge_setup(bridge->bus);
> >         if (err)
> >                 goto bridge_setup_fail;
> >
> >         /* We always enable PCI domains and we keep domain 0 backward
> >          * compatible in /proc for video cards
> >          */
> >         pci_add_flags(PCI_ENABLE_PROC_DOMAINS);
> >         pci_add_flags(PCI_REASSIGN_ALL_BUS | PCI_REASSIGN_ALL_RSRC);
> >
> >         lastbus = pci_scan_child_bus(bridge->bus);
> >         pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(bridge->bus, lastbus);
> >
> >         pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bridge->bus);
> >
> >         pci_bus_add_devices(bridge->bus);
> >
> >         return 0;
> >
> > bridge_setup_fail:
> >         put_device(&bridge->dev);
> >         device_unregister(&bridge->dev);
> > bridge_create_fail:
> >         kfree(pp);
> >         return err;
> > }
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Liviu
> >
> >
> > Catalin Marinas (1):
> >   arm64: Extend the PCI I/O space to 16MB
> >
> > Liviu Dudau (2):
> >   Fix ioport_map() for !CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP cases.
> >   arm64: Add architecture support for PCI
> >
> >  Documentation/arm64/memory.txt |  16 +--
> >  arch/arm64/Kconfig             |  19 +++-
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild  |   1 +
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h    |   5 +-
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h   |  51 +++++++++
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile     |   1 +
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c        | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/asm-generic/io.h       |   2 +-
> >  8 files changed, 258 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/pci.h
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> >
> > --
> > 1.9.0
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 

-- 
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world,  |
| but they're not |
| giving me the   |
 \ source code!  /
  ---------------
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯