linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: james.bottomley@parallels.com, webb.scales@hp.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	justin.lindley@hp.com, stephenmcameron@gmail.com,
	joseph.t.handzik@hp.com, thenzl@redhat.com,
	michael.miller@canonical.com, scott.teel@hp.com, hch@lst.de,
	dan.carpenter@oracle.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2 08/24] hpsa: choose number of reply queues more intelligently.
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 09:52:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140602145206.GH6970@beardog.cce.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140602092751.GA30545@infradead.org>

On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 02:27:51AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:53:02AM -0500, Stephen M. Cameron wrote:
> > From: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
> > 
> > No sense having 8 or 16 reply queues if you only have 4 cpus,
> > and likewise no sense limiting to 8 reply queues if you have
> > many more cpus.
> 
> I've applied this as it looks good as-is, but shouldn't we also
> cap the number of MSI-X vectors in common code so that we avoid
> adding this as boilerplate code to lots of drivers?

Maybe so.  Thinking about CPU hotplug, is num_online_cpus()
the right cap?  Maybe num_possible_cpus() is better in case
additional cpus coming online are anticipated?

-- steve

> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Mike Miller <michael.miller@canonical.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Scott Teel <scott.teel@hp.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/hpsa.c     |    2 ++
> >  drivers/scsi/hpsa_cmd.h |    2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
> > index b1ecfd8..b903e86 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
> > @@ -6157,6 +6157,8 @@ static void hpsa_interrupt_mode(struct ctlr_info *h)
> >  	if (pci_find_capability(h->pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX)) {
> >  		dev_info(&h->pdev->dev, "MSIX\n");
> >  		h->msix_vector = MAX_REPLY_QUEUES;
> > +		if (h->msix_vector > num_online_cpus())
> > +			h->msix_vector = num_online_cpus();
> >  		err = pci_enable_msix(h->pdev, hpsa_msix_entries,
> >  				      h->msix_vector);
> >  		if (err > 0) {
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hpsa_cmd.h b/drivers/scsi/hpsa_cmd.h
> > index db89245..104b67b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/hpsa_cmd.h
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/hpsa_cmd.h
> > @@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ struct TransTable_struct {
> >  	u32            RepQCount;
> >  	u32            RepQCtrAddrLow32;
> >  	u32            RepQCtrAddrHigh32;
> > -#define MAX_REPLY_QUEUES 8
> > +#define MAX_REPLY_QUEUES 64
> >  	struct vals32  RepQAddr[MAX_REPLY_QUEUES];
> >  };
> >  
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> ---end quoted text---

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-02 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20140529154739.8180.50710.stgit@beardog.cce.hp.com>
     [not found] ` <20140529155302.8180.17597.stgit@beardog.cce.hp.com>
2014-06-02  9:27   ` [PATCH 2 08/24] hpsa: choose number of reply queues more intelligently Christoph Hellwig
2014-06-02 14:52     ` scameron [this message]
2014-06-02 15:00       ` scameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140602145206.GH6970@beardog.cce.hp.com \
    --to=scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.bottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=joseph.t.handzik@hp.com \
    --cc=justin.lindley@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=michael.miller@canonical.com \
    --cc=scott.teel@hp.com \
    --cc=stephenmcameron@gmail.com \
    --cc=thenzl@redhat.com \
    --cc=webb.scales@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).