linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	yinghai@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Do not touch siblings in pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 16:16:20 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140617221620.GC30559@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402346730-2508-1-git-send-email-andreas.noever@gmail.com>

[+cc Yinghai]

On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 10:45:30PM +0200, Andreas Noever wrote:
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources is used to assign resources below
> a hotplug bridge. If the first attempt fails it will release some
> resources and try again. If a resource allocation on the hotplug bridge
> itself fails then pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources will invoke
> pci_bus_release_bridge_resources on the parent bus of the hotplug
> bridge. This in turn will release resources assigned to siblings of the
> hotplug bridge which may already be in use.
> 
> This patch checks for this case and prevents
> pci_bus_release_bridge_resources to be invoked on the parent bus.
> 
> The problem can be reproduced by having two sibling hotplug bridges A
> and B. The problem will occour if the parent of A and B does not have
> enough resources to satisfy window allocations for B during a hotplug
> event.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> I must admit that I do not fully understand how
> pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources works. Under which scenario would the
> second allocation attempt be successful?

I don't understand how all this works either.  Yinghai?

We definitely don't want to release resources that are already in use.  Can
you review and ack or nack this?

>  drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> index 138bdd6..2e418d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c
> @@ -1560,6 +1560,12 @@ void __init pci_assign_unassigned_resources(void)
>  		pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(root_bus);
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources - greenfield resource allocation
> + *
> + * Try to assign io and memory resources on and below @bridge. The caller must
> + * ensure that no device below @bridge is active.
> + */
>  void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge)
>  {
>  	struct pci_bus *parent = bridge->subordinate;
> @@ -1567,7 +1573,7 @@ void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge)
>  					want additional resources */
>  	int tried_times = 0;
>  	LIST_HEAD(fail_head);
> -	struct pci_dev_resource *fail_res;
> +	struct pci_dev_resource *fail_res, *tmp;
>  	int retval;
>  	unsigned long type_mask = IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM |
>  				  IORESOURCE_PREFETCH;
> @@ -1594,10 +1600,21 @@ again:
>  	 * Try to release leaf bridge's resources that doesn't fit resource of
>  	 * child device under that bridge
>  	 */
> -	list_for_each_entry(fail_res, &fail_head, list)
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(fail_res, tmp, &fail_head, list) {
> +		 /*
> +		  * The allocation of the mem/io window of the top level bridge
> +		  * can fail.  Without the following check we would release our
> +		  * siblings' resources.
> +		  */
> +		if (fail_res->dev == bridge) {
> +			list_del(&fail_res->list);
> +			kfree(fail_res);
> +			continue;
> +		}
>  		pci_bus_release_bridge_resources(fail_res->dev->bus,
>  						 fail_res->flags & type_mask,
>  						 whole_subtree);
> +	}
>  
>  	/* restore size and flags */
>  	list_for_each_entry(fail_res, &fail_head, list) {
> -- 
> 2.0.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-17 22:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-09 20:45 [PATCH] PCI: Do not touch siblings in pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources Andreas Noever
2014-06-17 22:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2014-06-17 23:39   ` Yinghai Lu
2014-06-18 22:40     ` Andreas Noever
2014-06-19  4:41       ` Yinghai Lu
2014-06-30 22:47         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-07-01 18:35           ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140617221620.GC30559@google.com \
    --to=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=andreas.noever@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).