From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:44261 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750960AbaG2N4l (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 09:56:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 06:56:41 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Tomas Henzl Cc: Alexander Gordeev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xjtuwjp@gmail.com, lindar_liu@usish.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Suresh Thiagarajan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 17/23] pm8001: Fix invalid return when request_irq() failed Message-ID: <20140729135641.GA14378@infradead.org> References: <5ecd9b80f705545c3dc85b2a4ae63a8ac3df8105.1405533479.git.agordeev@redhat.com> <53D79DE2.9000702@redhat.com> <20140729132020.GA7714@infradead.org> <53D7A62D.2090709@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <53D7A62D.2090709@redhat.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 03:48:29PM +0200, Tomas Henzl wrote: > I'm a bit confused - you were not commenting my text above I think? > > I see in drivers-for-3.17 this patch already applied 5607de7 > but not yet the next one (18/23) which also has a review, is there another ack needed? Looks like I got a bit confused due to a non-applying patch, but it seems like the one that failed was the second one. I'll look at it time permitting, but if someone familar with pm8001 can fix the reject for me that would help me greatly!