From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] drivers: pci: fix pci_mmap_fits() implementation for procfs mmap
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:32:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141113113233.GA8973@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo4bZn20LZjrayx=B51eHnNyrHHWFQMB3J_+EQF8ntg0Kw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 05:19:31PM +0000, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
[...]
> > I read your comment as an agreement on the approach I took in my patch,
> > except for the current pci_resource_to_user() implementation(s), which I did
> > not touch.
>
> Yes. I have two things I'd like to clear up:
>
> 1) Your patch changes behavior on platforms that implement their own
> pci_resource_to_user(). So I'd like to mention the details of that in
> the changelog, e.g., "procfs mmap on arches X, Y, Z has been broken
> since commit C, and this change fixes them." ARM doesn't implement
> pci_resource_to_user(), so I don't think ARM is one of those arches.
> But I'd really like to include specifics on what those arches are, and
> what we think is currently broken, so their maintainers at least get a
> heads-up and can look for that breakage.
I posted a v3, where I *tried* to bisect the commits that actually broke
the procfs interface and I added a commit log to explain why, it is very
hard to bisect a specific commit (given the dependency on the arch code)
and I do not have HW to test the fix on apart from ARM machines so there
is not much I can do on that side.
Please let me know what you think, thanks for having a look.
Lorenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-13 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-24 16:28 [PATCH RFC v2 0/2] Fix procfs PCI resources mmap Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-24 16:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] drivers: pci: fix pci_mmap_fits() implementation for procfs mmap Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-11-10 23:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-11-11 11:48 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-11-11 14:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-11-11 15:57 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-11-11 17:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-11-13 11:32 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2014-11-12 7:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-11-12 10:27 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-10-24 16:28 ` [PATCH RFC v2 2/2] arm: kernel: fix pci_mmap_page_range() offset calculation Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-11-04 14:15 ` [PATCH RFC v2 0/2] Fix procfs PCI resources mmap Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141113113233.GA8973@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=martin.wilck@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).