From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com>
Cc: phil.edworthy@renesas.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: rcar: Add PCIE_CONF_REGNO macro for PCIECAR register
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:44:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150320224446.GO26935@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426047830-26410-1-git-send-email-nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com>
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:23:50PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> The reg variable used when setting PCIECAR register need to be masked by 0xFC
> by restriction of the corresponding register.
> This adds PCIE_CONF_REGNO are macros for masking changes that PCIE_CONF_REGNO
> is used when setting PCIECAR register.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
> index c57bd0a..1f493ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
> @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@
> #define PCIE_CONF_BUS(b) (((b) & 0xff) << 24)
> #define PCIE_CONF_DEV(d) (((d) & 0x1f) << 19)
> #define PCIE_CONF_FUNC(f) (((f) & 0x7) << 16)
> +#define PCIE_CONF_REGNO(r) (r & 0xfc)
>
> #define RCAR_PCI_MAX_RESOURCES 4
> #define MAX_NR_INBOUND_MAPS 6
> @@ -227,7 +228,8 @@ static int rcar_pcie_config_access(struct rcar_pcie *pcie,
>
> /* Set the PIO address */
> rcar_pci_write_reg(pcie, PCIE_CONF_BUS(bus->number) |
> - PCIE_CONF_DEV(dev) | PCIE_CONF_FUNC(func) | reg, PCIECAR);
> + PCIE_CONF_DEV(dev) | PCIE_CONF_FUNC(func) |
> + PCIE_CONF_REGNO(reg), PCIECAR);
What about the other rcar_pci_read_reg()/rcar_pci_write_reg() calls (the
ones for "if (pci_is_root_bus())"? Do those need to be limited to the
first 256 bytes also?
It seems a little strange to mask "reg = where & ~3" at the top (making it
4-byte aligned), then mask "r & 0xfc" here (limiting to first 256 bytes and
also making it 4-byte aligned).
Seems like those two operations should either be combined or completely
split.
> /* Enable the configuration access */
> if (bus->parent->number == pcie->root_bus_nr)
> --
> 2.1.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-20 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-11 4:23 [PATCH] PCI: rcar: Add PCIE_CONF_REGNO macro for PCIECAR register Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
2015-03-20 22:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-03-23 16:16 ` Phil Edworthy
2015-03-25 6:13 ` Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150320224446.GO26935@google.com \
--to=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@renesas.com \
--cc=phil.edworthy@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).