linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Zhichang Yuan <yuanzhichang@hisilicon.com>
Cc: grant.likely@linaro.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com
Subject: Re: [[PATCH v1]] of/pci: fix a bug in function pci_pio_to_address
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:11:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150422151111.GG20701@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1429709759-79006-1-git-send-email-yuanzhichang@hisilicon.com>

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 09:35:59PM +0800, Zhichang Yuan wrote:
> In the patch whose commit id is 41f8bba7f5552d0, function pci_pio_to_address
> was introduced to retieve the corresponding I/O port by CPU address. But the
> convertion processing is not correct. It will return a wrong I/O port.
> This patch will fix it.

Hmmm, this subject and changelog don't seem right.  41f8bba7f555 did add
pci_pio_to_address(), but that converts an I/O port to a CPU address, and
this patch doesn't touch that function.

This patch changes pci_address_to_pio(), which does return the I/O port
corresponding to a CPU physical address.  This function was modified (but
not added) by 41f8bba7f555.

Please add:

Fixes: 41f8bba7f555 ("of/pci: Add pci_register_io_range() and pci_pio_to_address()")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v3.18+

> Signed-off-by: Zhichang Yuan <yuanzhichang@hisilicon.com>
> ---
>  drivers/of/address.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c
> index 78a7dcb..6906a3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/address.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/address.c
> @@ -765,7 +765,7 @@ unsigned long __weak pci_address_to_pio(phys_addr_t address)
>  	spin_lock(&io_range_lock);
>  	list_for_each_entry(res, &io_range_list, list) {
>  		if (address >= res->start && address < res->start + res->size) {
> -			addr = res->start - address + offset;
> +			addr = address - res->start + offset;

This looks like it's been broken since v3.18, and it's used by many
platforms.  I/O port space isn't as common as it used to be, but it's still
surprising that nobody noticed until now.

This change does look correct to me, but I want to double-check that we're
actually going to *fix* a bunch of platforms rather than breaking them.

>  			break;
>  		}
>  		offset += res->size;
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-22 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-22 13:35 [[PATCH v1]] of/pci: fix a bug in function pci_pio_to_address Zhichang Yuan
2015-04-22 14:06 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-04-22 15:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-04-22 16:17   ` Liviu Dudau
2015-04-23  1:51   ` yuanzhichang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150422151111.GG20701@google.com \
    --to=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuanzhichang@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).