From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci/hotplug: work-around for missing _RMV on HP ZBook G2
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 09:41:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150516144155.GH31666@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150516143750.GG31666@google.com>
[fix Rafael's email address]
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 09:37:50AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Hi Jarod,
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 03:33:58PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > The HP ZBook 15 and 17 Mobile Workstations, generation 2, up to and
> > including at least BIOS revision 01.07, do not have an ACPI _RMV object
> > associated with their expresscard slots, so acpi-based hotplug-capable
> > slot detection fails. If we fall back to pcie-based detection, the systems
> > work just fine, so this uses dmi matching to do that. With luck, a future
> > BIOS will remedy this (I've let someone at HP know about the problem),
> > but for now, just use this for all existing versions.
> >
> > Note: they *do* have a proper _RMV object for what I believe is their
> > thunderbolt ports.
> >
> > Tested successfully on an HP ZBook 17 G2 and HP ZBook 15 G2.
> >
> > CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> > CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
> > CC: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_acpi.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_acpi.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_acpi.c
> > index 93cc926..db38fb5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_acpi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_acpi.c
> > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> > #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/dmi.h>
> > #include "pciehp.h"
> >
> > #define PCIEHP_DETECT_PCIE (0)
> > @@ -109,10 +110,40 @@ static struct pcie_port_service_driver __initdata dummy_driver = {
> > .probe = dummy_probe,
> > };
> >
> > +static int __init set_slot_detection_mode_pcie(const struct dmi_system_id *d)
> > +{
> > + info("%s lacks ACPI _RMV object for expresscard\n", d->ident);
> > + return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct dmi_system_id __initdata missing_acpi_rmv[] = {
> > + /* ZBook 17 through at least bios v01.07 */
> > + {
> > + .callback = set_slot_detection_mode_pcie,
> > + .ident = "HP ZBook 17 G2 Mobile Workstation",
> > + .matches = {
> > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Hewlett-Packard"),
> > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "HP ZBook 17 G2"),
> > + },
> > + },
> > + /* ZBook 15 through at least bios v01.07 */
> > + {
> > + .callback = set_slot_detection_mode_pcie,
> > + .ident = "HP ZBook 15 G2 Mobile Workstation",
> > + .matches = {
> > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Hewlett-Packard"),
> > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "HP ZBook 15 G2"),
> > + },
> > + },
> > + { .ident = NULL }
> > +};
> > +
> > static int __init select_detection_mode(void)
> > {
> > struct dummy_slot *slot, *tmp;
> >
> > + if (dmi_check_system(missing_acpi_rmv))
> > + return PCIEHP_DETECT_PCIE;
>
> Oh, my goodness. I forgot how terrible this path is. Can anyone write a
> simple explanation of how we choose to use acpiphp or pciehp? Module
> parameters? A dummy driver that looks for duplicate slot numbers? Looking
> for _ADR, _EJ0, _RMV? This is just nuts.
>
> I can't really believe that we're doing this correctly.
>
> If I understand correctly, the ZBooks don't have _RMV, but we try to use
> acpiphp anyway, and acpiphp doesn't work? That sounds more like a problem
> with our acpiphp/pciehp selection "algorithm" than a BIOS bug.
>
> Jarod, can you open a report at http://bugzilla.kernel.org and attach a
> complete dmesg log, "lspci -vv" output, and an acpidump? I'm particularly
> interested in whether the BIOS granted us control over PCIe native hotplug.
> If it did, I wonder why we would even attempt to use acpiphp.
>
> Bjorn
>
> > if (pcie_port_service_register(&dummy_driver))
> > return PCIEHP_DETECT_ACPI;
> > pcie_port_service_unregister(&dummy_driver);
> > @@ -134,4 +165,6 @@ void __init pciehp_acpi_slot_detection_init(void)
> > out:
> > if (slot_detection_mode == PCIEHP_DETECT_ACPI)
> > info("Using ACPI for slot detection.\n");
> > + else if (slot_detection_mode == PCIEHP_DETECT_PCIE)
> > + info("Using PCIE-based slot detection.\n");
> > }
> > --
> > 1.8.3.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-16 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-14 19:33 [PATCH] pci/hotplug: work-around for missing _RMV on HP ZBook G2 Jarod Wilson
2015-05-16 14:37 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-16 14:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-05-18 0:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-18 14:33 ` Jarod Wilson
2015-05-18 16:17 ` Jarod Wilson
2015-05-18 20:45 ` Jarod Wilson
2015-05-18 23:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-19 3:06 ` Jarod Wilson
2015-05-19 11:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-19 11:43 ` [PATCH] PCIe / hotplug: Drop pointless ACPI-based "slot detection" check Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-19 12:42 ` Jarod Wilson
2015-05-19 13:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-19 13:27 ` [Update][PATCH] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-19 14:40 ` Jarod Wilson
2015-05-21 16:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-22 1:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-06-11 17:05 ` Jarod Wilson
2015-06-11 20:38 ` Jarod Wilson
2015-06-11 21:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-06-11 21:49 ` Jarod Wilson
2015-05-18 21:57 ` [PATCH] pci/hotplug: work-around for missing _RMV on HP ZBook G2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-05-18 14:30 ` Jarod Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150516144155.GH31666@google.com \
--to=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jarod@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).