From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: wdavis@nvidia.com
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, tripperda@nvidia.com,
jhubbard@nvidia.com, jglisse@redhat.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] DMA-API: Add dma_(un)map_resource() documentation
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 18:43:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150519234300.GA31666@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431973504-5903-5-git-send-email-wdavis@nvidia.com>
[+cc Dave, Jonathan]
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 01:25:01PM -0500, wdavis@nvidia.com wrote:
> From: Will Davis <wdavis@nvidia.com>
>
> Add references to both the general API documentation as well as the HOWTO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Davis <wdavis@nvidia.com>
> ---
> Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> Documentation/DMA-API.txt | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt b/Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt
> index 0f7afb2..89bd730 100644
> --- a/Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt
> @@ -138,6 +138,10 @@ What about block I/O and networking buffers? The block I/O and
> networking subsystems make sure that the buffers they use are valid
> for you to DMA from/to.
>
> +In some systems, it may also be possible to DMA to and/or from a peer
> +device's MMIO region, as described by a 'struct resource'. This is
> +referred to as a peer-to-peer mapping.
> +
> DMA addressing limitations
>
> Does your device have any DMA addressing limitations? For example, is
> @@ -648,6 +652,35 @@ Every dma_map_{single,sg}() call should have its dma_unmap_{single,sg}()
> counterpart, because the bus address space is a shared resource and
> you could render the machine unusable by consuming all bus addresses.
>
> +Peer-to-peer DMA mappings can be obtained using dma_map_resource() to map
> +another device's MMIO region for the given device:
> +
> + struct resource *peer_mmio_res = &other_dev->resource[0];
> + dma_addr_t dma_handle = dma_map_resource(dev, peer_mmio_res,
> + offset, size, direction);
> + if (dma_handle == 0 || dma_mapping_error(dev, dma_handle))
> + {
> + /*
> + * If dma_handle == 0, dma_map_resource() is not
> + * implemented, and peer-to-peer transactions will not
> + * work.
> + */
> + goto map_error_handling;
> + }
> +
> + ...
> +
> + dma_unmap_resource(dev, dma_handle, size, direction);
> +
> +Here, "offset" means byte offset within the given resource.
> +
> +You should both check for a 0 return value and call dma_mapping_error(),
> +as dma_map_resource() can either be not implemented or fail and return
> +error as outlined under the dma_map_single() discussion.
> +
> +You should call dma_unmap_resource() when DMA activity is finished, e.g.,
> +from the interrupt which told you that the DMA transfer is done.
> +
> If you need to use the same streaming DMA region multiple times and touch
> the data in between the DMA transfers, the buffer needs to be synced
> properly in order for the CPU and device to see the most up-to-date and
> @@ -765,8 +798,8 @@ failure can be determined by:
>
> - checking if dma_alloc_coherent() returns NULL or dma_map_sg returns 0
>
> -- checking the dma_addr_t returned from dma_map_single() and dma_map_page()
> - by using dma_mapping_error():
> +- checking the dma_addr_t returned from dma_map_single(), dma_map_resource(),
> + and dma_map_page() by using dma_mapping_error():
>
> dma_addr_t dma_handle;
>
> @@ -780,6 +813,8 @@ failure can be determined by:
> goto map_error_handling;
> }
>
> +- checking if dma_map_resource() returns 0
> +
> - unmap pages that are already mapped, when mapping error occurs in the middle
> of a multiple page mapping attempt. These example are applicable to
> dma_map_page() as well.
> diff --git a/Documentation/DMA-API.txt b/Documentation/DMA-API.txt
> index 5208840..c25c549 100644
> --- a/Documentation/DMA-API.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/DMA-API.txt
> @@ -283,14 +283,40 @@ and <size> parameters are provided to do partial page mapping, it is
> recommended that you never use these unless you really know what the
> cache width is.
>
> +dma_addr_t
> +dma_map_resource(struct device *dev, struct resource *res,
> + unsigned long offset, size_t size,
> + enum dma_data_direction_direction)
> +
> +API for mapping resources. This API allows a driver to map a peer
> +device's resource for DMA. All the notes and warnings for the other
> +APIs apply here. Also, the success of this API does not validate or
> +guarantee that peer-to-peer transactions between the device and its
> +peer will be functional. They only grant access so that if such
> +transactions are possible, an IOMMU will not prevent them from
> +succeeding.
If the driver can't tell whether peer-to-peer accesses will actually work,
this seems like sort of a dubious API. I'm trying to imagine how a driver
would handle this. I guess whether peer-to-peer works depends on the
underlying platform (not the devices themselves)? If we run the driver on
a platform where peer-to-peer *doesn't* work, what happens? The driver
can't tell, so we just rely on the user to say "this isn't working as
expected"?
> +If this API is not provided by the underlying implementation, 0 is
> +returned and the driver must take appropriate action. Otherwise, the
> +DMA address is returned, and that DMA address should be checked by
> +the driver (see dma_mapping_error() below).
> +
> +void
> +dma_unmap_resource(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_address, size_t size,
> + enum dma_data_direction direction)
> +
> +Unmaps the resource previously mapped. All the parameters passed in
> +must be identical to those passed in to (and returned by) the mapping
> +API.
> +
> int
> dma_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr)
>
> -In some circumstances dma_map_single() and dma_map_page() will fail to create
> -a mapping. A driver can check for these errors by testing the returned
> -DMA address with dma_mapping_error(). A non-zero return value means the mapping
> -could not be created and the driver should take appropriate action (e.g.
> -reduce current DMA mapping usage or delay and try again later).
> +In some circumstances dma_map_single(), dma_map_page() and dma_map_resource()
> +will fail to create a mapping. A driver can check for these errors by testing
> +the returned DMA address with dma_mapping_error(). A non-zero return value
> +means the mapping could not be created and the driver should take appropriate
> +action (e.g. reduce current DMA mapping usage or delay and try again later).
>
> int
> dma_map_sg(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
> --
> 2.4.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-19 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-18 18:24 [PATCH v2 0/7] IOMMU/DMA map_resource support for peer-to-peer wdavis
2015-05-18 18:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] dma-debug: add checking for map/unmap_resource wdavis
2015-05-18 18:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] DMA-API: Introduce dma_(un)map_resource wdavis
2015-05-29 8:16 ` Joerg Roedel
2015-05-18 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] dma-mapping: pci: add pci_(un)map_resource wdavis
2015-05-18 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] DMA-API: Add dma_(un)map_resource() documentation wdavis
2015-05-19 23:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-05-20 12:11 ` Mark Hounschell
2015-05-20 17:30 ` William Davis
2015-05-20 19:15 ` Mark Hounschell
2015-05-20 19:51 ` William Davis
2015-05-20 20:07 ` Mark Hounschell
2015-05-27 18:31 ` William Davis
2015-05-29 8:24 ` joro
2015-07-07 15:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-07 15:41 ` Alex Williamson
2015-07-07 16:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-07 16:41 ` Alex Williamson
2015-07-07 17:14 ` Mark Hounschell
2015-07-07 17:28 ` Alex Williamson
2015-07-07 19:17 ` Mark Hounschell
2015-07-07 19:54 ` Alex Williamson
2015-07-08 15:11 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-08 16:40 ` Mark Hounschell
2015-07-09 0:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-06-01 21:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-06-02 14:27 ` William Davis
2015-05-18 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] iommu/amd: Implement (un)map_resource wdavis
2015-05-18 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] iommu/vt-d: implement (un)map_resource wdavis
2015-05-18 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] x86: add pci-nommu implementation of map_resource wdavis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150519234300.GA31666@google.com \
--to=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tripperda@nvidia.com \
--cc=wdavis@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).