From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@piap.pl>,
Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@renesas.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Minghuan Lian <minghuan.Lian@freescale.com>,
Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@ti.com>,
Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@apm.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
Jayachandran C <jchandra@broadcom.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH 2/2] ARM64: kernel: pci: implement PCI device resources claiming
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 10:16:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150520091615.GD29274@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150519232531.GZ31666@google.com>
Hi Bjorn,
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:25:31AM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 03:42:16PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > When a device is scanned and added to the PCI bus, its resources
> > should be claimed to validate the BARs configuration and to assign
> > them a parent resource so that the resource hierarchy can be sanity
> > checked.
> >
> > This patch adds code that carries out PCI device resources claiming to
> > the ARM64 pcibios_add_device implementation so that device resources
> > are claimed by the core PCI layer upon PCI device initialization on
> > ARM64 systems.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>
> Seems like Suravee proposed a tweak? Can you post a v2 with that
> incorporated if necessary?
I can post a v2, but I am not happy about that tweak, I want to
understand why pci_read_bridge_bases has to be executed only on
PCI_PROBE_ONLY systems and why it can't be done in generic code in the
first place - ie pci_scan_child_bus(), I guess as I mentioned that in
some archs this can trigger regressions, if you have an opinion please
let me know, when we agree I will drop a v2 on the lists.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> Bjorn
>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > index 4095379..c0a88ca 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
> > @@ -43,8 +43,18 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource *res,
> > */
> > int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > {
> > + struct resource *res;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0);
> >
> > + for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_RESOURCES; i++) {
> > + res = &dev->resource[i];
> > + if (res->parent || !res->flags)
> > + continue;
> > + pci_claim_resource(dev, i);
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.2.1
> >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-20 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-14 14:42 [RFC/RFT PATCH 1/2] ARM: kernel: bios32: implement PCI device resources claiming Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-14 14:42 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH 2/2] ARM64: kernel: pci: " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-15 2:09 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2015-05-18 17:38 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-18 19:44 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2015-05-20 8:56 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-20 13:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-20 17:48 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-05-19 23:25 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-20 9:16 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150520091615.GD29274@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=jchandra@broadcom.com \
--cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=khalasa@piap.pl \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=m-karicheri2@ti.com \
--cc=minghuan.Lian@freescale.com \
--cc=phil.edworthy@renesas.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=tinamdar@apm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).