linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, mjg59@coreos.com, rwhite@pobox.com,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: Fix NULL pointer when find parent pcie_link_state
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 10:08:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150520150830.GB30184@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432006005-9758-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:26:45AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94361 reported
> in ATCA platform, system had unusual pcie topology:
> 
> (root port)   (downstream port)   (upstream port)
> +-1c.0-[02-0a]----00.0-[03-0a]--+-00.0-[04]--
> |                               +-01.0-[05]-- (downstream port)
> |                               +-02.0-[06]--
> |                               +-03.0-[07]--
> |                               +-08.0-[08]--
> |                               +-09.0-[09]--
> |                               \-0a.0-[0a]--
> We assumed root port and downstream port always
> have external link, and downstream port always has a
> upstream port. So in this case, when we allocated
> pcie_link_state for downstream port 02:00.0, it try
> to get parent bus pcie_link_state,
> parent = pdev->bus->parent->self->link_state;
> because root bus self is NULL, system will crash here.
> 
> This patch fix this issue based on the following
> assumption suggested by Bjorn.
> 1. Root port is always on the upstream end of a link.
> 2. The pcie hierarchy should alternate between links
> and internal switch logic, there should be no adjacent
> links or internal buses in pcie tree.
> 
> Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c |    7 +++----
>  drivers/pci/probe.c     |   12 ++++++++++++
>  include/linux/pci.h     |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> index 7d4fcdc..8830740 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -561,8 +561,8 @@ void pcie_aspm_init_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  
>  	if (!pci_is_pcie(pdev) || pdev->link_state)
>  		return;
> -	if (pci_pcie_type(pdev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT &&
> -	    pci_pcie_type(pdev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM)
> +
> +	if (!pdev->has_secondary_link)
>  		return;
>  
>  	/* VIA has a strange chipset, root port is under a bridge */
> @@ -723,8 +723,7 @@ static void __pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool sem,
>  	if (!pci_is_pcie(pdev))
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
> -	    pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM)
> +	if (pdev->has_secondary_link)
>  		parent = pdev;
>  	if (!parent || !parent->link_state)
>  		return;

Can you separate the ASPM part from the addition of
pdev->has_secondary_link?  I think there will be other users, and I don't
necessarily want the patch to suggest that it's only needed for ASPM.

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index a9c5e63..ad26ff2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -982,6 +982,18 @@ void set_pcie_port_type(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	pdev->pcie_flags_reg = reg16;
>  	pci_read_config_word(pdev, pos + PCI_EXP_DEVCAP, &reg16);
>  	pdev->pcie_mpss = reg16 & PCI_EXP_DEVCAP_PAYLOAD;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We assume root port is always on the upstream end of
> +	 * a link, and the pcie hierarchy should alternate
> +	 * between links and internal switch logic.
> +	 */
> +	if (pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)
> +		pdev->has_secondary_link = 1;
> +
> +	if (pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM
> +			&& !pdev->bus->self->has_secondary_link)

Please use pci_upstream_bridge() here instead of chasing the pointers
explicitly.  Then we don't have to worry about whether any of the corner
cases handled in pci_upstream_bridge() apply here.

The fact that you only set has_secondary_link for Downstream Ports means we
won't handle the case of Upstream Ports (device 03:00.0 in this topology).
That port *does* have a link on its secondary side.  Is there a reason you
want to exclude it?  It seems like we ought to be able to enable ASPM on
that link.

> +		pdev->has_secondary_link = 1;
>  }
>  
>  void set_pcie_hotplug_bridge(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> index 50b7c7d..141fcc1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ struct pci_dev {
>  	unsigned int	broken_intx_masking:1;
>  	unsigned int	io_window_1k:1;	/* Intel P2P bridge 1K I/O windows */
>  	unsigned int	irq_managed:1;
> +	unsigned int	has_secondary_link:1;
>  	pci_dev_flags_t dev_flags;
>  	atomic_t	enable_cnt;	/* pci_enable_device has been called */
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-20 15:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-19  3:26 [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: Fix NULL pointer when find parent pcie_link_state Yijing Wang
2015-05-20 15:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-05-21  2:18   ` Yijing Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150520150830.GB30184@google.com \
    --to=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@coreos.com \
    --cc=rwhite@pobox.com \
    --cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).