From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, mjg59@coreos.com, rwhite@pobox.com,
alex.williamson@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] PCI/ASPM: Fix NULL pointer when find parent pcie_link_state
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 14:42:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150522194207.GI32152@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432191904-16451-2-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:05:03PM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94361 reported
> in ATCA platform, system had unusual pcie topology:
>
> (root port) (downstream port) (upstream port)
> +-1c.0-[02-0a]----00.0-[03-0a]--+-00.0-[04]--
> | +-01.0-[05]-- (downstream port)
> | +-02.0-[06]--
> | +-03.0-[07]--
> | +-08.0-[08]--
> | +-09.0-[09]--
> | \-0a.0-[0a]--
> We assumed root port and downstream port always
> have external link, and downstream port always has a
> upstream port. So in this case, when we allocated
> pcie_link_state for downstream port 02:00.0, it try
> to get parent bus pcie_link_state,
> parent = pdev->bus->parent->self->link_state;
> because root bus self is NULL, system will crash here.
>
> Use pdev->has_secondary_link(introduced in previous patch)
> to fix this issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 7 +++----
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> index 7d4fcdc..8830740 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -561,8 +561,8 @@ void pcie_aspm_init_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>
> if (!pci_is_pcie(pdev) || pdev->link_state)
> return;
> - if (pci_pcie_type(pdev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT &&
> - pci_pcie_type(pdev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM)
> +
> + if (!pdev->has_secondary_link)
> return;
>
> /* VIA has a strange chipset, root port is under a bridge */
> @@ -723,8 +723,7 @@ static void __pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool sem,
> if (!pci_is_pcie(pdev))
> return;
>
> - if (pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
> - pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM)
> + if (pdev->has_secondary_link)
> parent = pdev;
> if (!parent || !parent->link_state)
> return;
I think we also have a problem here:
517 static struct pcie_link_state *alloc_pcie_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
518 {
519 struct pcie_link_state *link;
520
521 link = kzalloc(sizeof(*link), GFP_KERNEL);
522 if (!link)
523 return NULL;
524 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&link->sibling);
525 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&link->children);
526 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&link->link);
527 link->pdev = pdev;
528 if (pci_pcie_type(pdev) == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM) {
529 struct pcie_link_state *parent;
530 parent = pdev->bus->parent->self->link_state;
531 if (!parent) {
532 kfree(link);
533 return NULL;
534 }
535 link->parent = parent;
536 list_add(&link->link, &parent->children);
537 }
Before your patch, we could only see Root Ports or Downstream Ports at line
528. Now we may also see Upstream Ports, so I think that test should be
changed to "if (pci_pcie_type(pdev) != PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT)".
Without this change, I think we would allocate pcie_link_state for the
03:00.0 Upstream Port in your example, but it would not be connected to the
tree of links starting at the 00:1c.0 Root Port.
Do you agree?
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-22 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-21 7:05 [PATCH v4 1/3] PCI: Add pdev->has_secondary_link to mark pcie link Yijing Wang
2015-05-21 7:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] PCI/ASPM: Fix NULL pointer when find parent pcie_link_state Yijing Wang
2015-05-22 19:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-05-25 1:26 ` Yijing Wang
2015-05-21 7:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] PCI: Use pdev->has_secondary_link to identify pcie link Yijing Wang
2015-05-26 23:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-05-26 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] PCI: Add pdev->has_secondary_link to mark " Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150522194207.GI32152@google.com \
--to=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@coreos.com \
--cc=rwhite@pobox.com \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).