linux-pci.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Gregor Dick <gdick@solarflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] PCI: Clean up ATS error handling
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:57:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150720155743.GC16841@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150720142400.GG13082@suse.de>

On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:24:00PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 04:32:40PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > There's no need to BUG() if we enable ATS when it's already enabled.  We
> > don't need to BUG() when disabling ATS on a device that doesn't support ATS
> > or if it's already disabled.  If ATS is enabled, certainly we found an ATS
> > capability in the past, so it should still be there now.
> > 
> > Clean up these error paths.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/ats.c |    7 ++-----
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/ats.c b/drivers/pci/ats.c
> > index c35de8e..9069126 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/ats.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/ats.c
> > @@ -43,8 +43,6 @@ int pci_enable_ats(struct pci_dev *dev, int ps)
> >  {
> >  	u16 ctrl;
> >  
> > -	BUG_ON(dev->ats_cap && dev->ats_enabled);
> > -
> >  	if (!dev->ats_cap)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> 
> Hmm, what happens if pci_enable_ats is called twice for the same
> device? Can we change the STU without disabling ATS first, for example?
> 
> The function should probably return if it finds ATS already enabled (or
> at least WARN when it is enabled and ps != last ps value).

It would probably be nicest if:

  - enabling PF fails if ATS is already enabled
  - enabling VF fails if (PF ATS is disabled || PS != PF PS)
  - disabling PF fails if ATS is enabled on any VF

I added the first (which we basically had before in the BUG_ON()), and I
already had the second.

The third is where it gets messy because we have either add a refcount and
associated locking, or we have to iterate through all the VFs.  I did
consider both of those but thought it was a lot of work for the way it's
currently used: it looks like ATS is enabled for every device when it is
enumerated, with a fixed PS, and never changed.

But I guess a refcount with atomic_inc() probably wouldn't be too hard.
Let me poke at that.

Bjorn

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-20 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-17 21:31 [PATCH 0/8] PCI: Fix ATS deadlock Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-17 21:31 ` [PATCH 1/8] PCI: Allocate ATS struct during enumeration Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-20 13:47   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-20 13:55   ` Joerg Roedel
2015-07-20 15:34     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-17 21:32 ` [PATCH 2/8] PCI: Embed ATS info directly into struct pci_dev Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-20 14:03   ` Joerg Roedel
2015-07-20 16:26     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-17 21:32 ` [PATCH 3/8] PCI: Reduce size of ATS structure elements Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-20 14:27   ` Joerg Roedel
2015-07-17 21:32 ` [PATCH 4/8] PCI: Rationalize pci_ats_queue_depth() error checking Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-20 14:15   ` Joerg Roedel
2015-07-17 21:32 ` [PATCH 5/8] PCI: Inline the ATS setup code into pci_ats_init() Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-20 14:15   ` Joerg Roedel
2015-07-17 21:32 ` [PATCH 6/8] PCI: Use pci_physfn() rather than looking up physfn by hand Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-20 14:17   ` Joerg Roedel
2015-07-17 21:32 ` [PATCH 7/8] PCI: Clean up ATS error handling Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-20 14:24   ` Joerg Roedel
2015-07-20 15:57     ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-07-17 21:32 ` [PATCH 8/8] PCI: Move ATS declarations to linux/pci.h so they're all together Bjorn Helgaas
2015-07-20 14:25   ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150720155743.GC16841@google.com \
    --to=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gdick@solarflare.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).