From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/1] iommu: Detach device from domain when removed from group
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:25:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150803142535.583677b7@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438106156-51847-1-git-send-email-gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 19:55:55 +0200
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> during IOMMU API function testing on s390 I hit the following scenario:
>
> After binding a device to vfio-pci, the user completes the VFIO_SET_IOMMU
> ioctl and stops, see the sample C program below. Now the device is manually
> removed via "echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../remove".
>
> Although the SET_IOMMU ioctl triggered the attach_dev callback in the
> underlying IOMMU API, removing the device in this way won't trigger the
> detach_dev callback, neither during remove nor when the user program
> continues with closing group/container.
>
> On s390, this eventually leads to a kernel panic when binding the device
> again to its non-vfio PCI driver, because of the missing arch-specific
> cleanup in detach_dev. On x86, the detach_dev callback will also not be
> called directly, but there is a notifier that will catch
> BUS_NOTIFY_REMOVED_DEVICE and eventually do the cleanup. Other
> architectures w/o the notifier probably have at least some kind of memory
> leak in this scenario, so a general fix would be nice.
>
> My first approach was to try and fix this in VFIO code, but Alex Williamson
> pointed me to some asymmetry in the IOMMU code: iommu_group_add_device()
> will invoke the attach_dev callback, but iommu_group_remove_device() won't
> trigger detach_dev. Fixing this asymmetry would fix the issue for me, but
> is this the correct fix? Any thoughts?
Ping.
The suggested fix may be completely wrong, but not having detach_dev called
seems like like a serious issue, any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Gerald
>
>
> Here is the sample C program to trigger the ioctl:
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <linux/vfio.h>
>
> int main(void)
> {
> int container, group, rc;
>
> container = open("/dev/vfio/vfio", O_RDWR);
> if (container < 0) {
> perror("open /dev/vfio/vfio\n");
> return -1;
> }
>
> group = open("/dev/vfio/0", O_RDWR);
> if (group < 0) {
> perror("open /dev/vfio/0\n");
> return -1;
> }
>
> rc = ioctl(group, VFIO_GROUP_SET_CONTAINER, &container);
> if (rc) {
> perror("ioctl VFIO_GROUP_SET_CONTAINER\n");
> return -1;
> }
>
> rc = ioctl(container, VFIO_SET_IOMMU, VFIO_TYPE1_IOMMU);
> if (rc) {
> perror("ioctl VFIO_SET_IOMMU\n");
> return -1;
> }
>
> printf("Try device remove...\n");
> getchar();
>
> close(group);
> close(container);
> return 0;
> }
>
> Gerald Schaefer (1):
> iommu: Detach device from domain when removed from group
>
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-03 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-28 17:55 [RFC PATCH 0/1] iommu: Detach device from domain when removed from group Gerald Schaefer
2015-07-28 17:55 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] " Gerald Schaefer
2015-08-03 12:25 ` Gerald Schaefer [this message]
2015-08-03 15:48 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] " Joerg Roedel
2015-08-03 17:04 ` Gerald Schaefer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150803142535.583677b7@thinkpad \
--to=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).